Thursday, March 25, 2021

Medal of Honor - Jackson, Michigan

On this year's Medal of Honor Day, I'd like to present the men with a relationship to Jackson County that have received our nation's highest military honor.  Some were born here.  Others came here after their respective conflicts had ended.

Should you follow the links to their respective profiles, you will find dramatically different actions that qualified each man performed that led to their being awarded the Medal of Honor.  I find the actions of SSgt James Bondsteel to be of particular note.

Jackson County (MI) Medal of Honor Monument

Jackson County (MI) Medal of Honor Monument - Detail

Jackson County veterans dedicated our Medal of Honor monument almost a decade ago on Veteran's Day of 2011.  At the time, Blackman Township was looking to rename the former Holiday Inn Drive due to the fact that the Holiday Inn structure had been sold and renamed with the new Holiday Inn being located a few miles away.  The decision to rename the road as Bondsteel Drive was not universally well-received.  One business located on the road objected and on the day of the dedication refused to allow veterans to use their parking lot for the half-hour ceremony.

The four men currently honored on the monument are:

William H. Withington

William H. Withington led one of the first contingents of volunteers to respond to Abraham Lincoln's call for units to serve in the Civil War.  Capt. Withington fought at the First Battle of Bull Run where he saved a fallen Union general and was taken captive.  After being released in a prisoner exchange, Withington returned to Michigan and enlisted in the 17th Michigan Infantry as a Colonel and fought in three major Civil War battles.  He received the Medal of Honor for his actions at Bull Run.

Withington is of particular note in Jackson's history.  He was an industrialist that formed and ran many companies.  The most significant company would eventually be named the Sparton Corporation after Withington and later company executive William Sparks.  The company left Jackson in 2009.

Withington is honored in the area by the city's football field (Withington Community Stadium) as well as a city park that is home to the county's veterans memorial (Withington Park).

Frederick A. Lyon

As a Corporal in the US Army, Federick Lyon halted an ambulance that was part of a general Confederate retreat from the battle of Cedar Creek.  The ambulance happened to be transporting Confederate General Stephen Ramseur and two other officers.  He and a fellow soldier took the group along with the regimental colors prisoner and returned them to the Union side.

Edwin F. Savacool

Captain Savacool fought in the last major battle of the Civil War at Sailor's Creek, VA.  He was one of many who captured the battle colors (and thus the command) of Confederate Units on that day.  He was wounded during the fighting and died nearly two months later.  The Jackson native was originally interred in Marshall, MI but his remains were later relocated to Detroit.  You can read more about Captain Savacool's interesting history here.

James Bondsteel

SSgt Bondsteel was serving with Company A, 2nd Bn, 2nd Infantry, 1st Infantry Div in Vietnam when his unit was called to support another unit that was under fire from an NVA battalion.  During the action, SSgt Bondsteel personally destroyed ten enemy bunkers and one machine gun emplacement.  He was wounded during the four-hour action yet still came to the aid of a wounded officer.  SSgt. Bondsteel refused medical treatment and continued to organize and lead his unit until they were properly relieved.

After the service, Jim Bondsteel became a counselor for the Veterans Administration.  He was killed in a logging truck accident in Alaska where his remains were interred.  He is honored with a memorial at the Alaska Veterans Memorial in the Denali State Park and with the naming of Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo.

Alaska Veterans Memorial Marker

His life was recalled in a 2018 article in the Hillsdale (MI) Daily News.  He is also remembered on a personal website.

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Physicality - Men and Women

When I served in the Corps back in the day, one of my friends was roughly 5'-6 to 5'-8 and weighed 140-150 lbs.  Another friend who was over 6'-0 had to be in the 220 lbs range.  Neither (to the best of my knowledge) was the second incarnation of Bruce Lee, but they were tough enough.

Put them in a ring and who would you put money on?  

There is a recurring debate about the differences between men and women.  Differences that are driven by biology, genetics, science.  The latest iteration of the debate was kicked off by a Tucker Carlson rant about the military services creating uniforms (including flight suits) for pregnant service members and plans to alter hairstyles for women.

For the record, I don't care about those changes.  I wouldn't want a pilot to be in a dogfight performing high g maneuvers in an F-35 and 8 months pregnant.  It wouldn't be safe for anyone.  Take the same pilot several months later and the situation wouldn't be safe for just one person; the idiot that took their plane off the runway to engage a US pilot - any US pilot - flying our best fighter in the first place.  And hair is just hair.  A hairstyle is fine as long as it doesn't interfere with mission accomplishment.  Women have wanted to wear ponytails and/or braids in uniform for a long while.  Keep it neat, clean, and out of the way and it's fine.

I served with many women who were outstanding Marines.  Tucker's rant was poorly aimed at best.

So what does physical capability have to do with uniform/hair regulations?  Nothing.

But debates over uniforms and hairstyles (and a couple of other topics) inevitably wander into the physical capabilities of men relative to the same capabilities of women.

There is a difference that some people do not want to acknowledge  They will deflect the issue by pointing out women at the upper end of the bell curve such as Rhonda Rousey or Gina Carano.  Again, for the record, I wouldn't have wanted to climb into the ring with either of those women when I was in my prime.  They are indeed at the top end of the bell curve of physical fitness for women.  They individually outclass the majority of men in both physical fitness and fighting ability/preparation.

Let's start with some basics; average height and weight.  Men are, on average, taller and heavier than women.  That gives an advantage in most physical competitions.  The following was taken from the ever-questionable Wikipedia on 16 March 2021.  Note that in every country, the average for men is greater than the average for women.  

Average Human Body Weight - Men vs. Women - Click to Embiggen


Average Human Height - Men vs. Women - Click to Embiggen

Those basic differences create an advantage for men.  A longer arm reach makes it easier to get at an opponent while keeping yourself out of range.  Longer legs create a longer stride for greater speed.  There are other physiological differences such as the impact of testosterone on muscle development.  If I were a doctor or a physiology major, I could list several biological differences between men and women that impact their relative performance in physical competitions, but I'm not either one of those.

What I can do is point you towards measurements of the peak physical performance of men and women.  Judge for yourself.  In almost every category, the record for peak performance is held by a man.  In weight lifting competitions where there are weight classes, the nearest comparison between men and women always shows the man is, pound for pound, able to lift more weight.

[I was looking at swimming data a couple of years ago and did note that there was one category where the top competitor was a woman.  I couldn't find that category recently.  It is certainly possible for a woman to be the best on the planet in a straight physical competition.  Where that is the case, it is an exception that illustrates the rule.]

Again, all of these are from the ever questionable Wikipedia.  Go have a look.

A straight comparison cannot be made in every category in the above competitions.  For example, in speed skating, the men have a 5k relay while the women have a 3k relay.  If you adjust the times/distances to account for the difference, the men were faster over the same distance in almost every category even though they had to perform over a longer distance in actual competition.

I added the "almost" because I didn't check every category with a competitive differential and there probably is one where the women were faster/stronger over a shorter distance.  

A case in point would be Serena Williams.  Let's face it, she is the creme de la creme of women's tennis.  She and her sister dominate the sport and have dominated it for decades.  But even she knows that there is a difference between men's and women's tennis.  Andy Murray once challenged her to a match.  Ms. Williams declined.

“If I were to play Andy Murray, I would lose 6-0, 6-0 in five to six minutes, maybe 10 minutes. No, it’s true. It’s a completely different sport. The men are a lot faster and they serve harder, they hit harder, it’s just a different game.”

Why would she say such a thing?  Well she, and her sister had some experience playing against men.  In 1998, they played a set against Karsten Braasch who was, at the time, ranked roughly 200 in men's tennis.  He beat Serena 6-1 and then beat Venus 6-2.  Serena finished the 1998 WTA season ranked 20th in the world.  Venus finished the season ranked 5th.

I am well aware that my personal tennis game sucks.  Don't bother going there.

The larger point is that while the bell curve of the physical performance of women largely overlaps the bell curve for men, it is not the same curve.  The average of the performance curve for men is somewhat above that for women.  The top-end tail of the curve for men generally extends beyond the same tail for women.  Those non-trivial differences are driven by biology, genetics, science.

Physical differences do not make men smarter, more moral, better leaders, or otherwise more qualified than women.  But there is a documented differential in physical performance between men and women just the same.

There are times where that difference might mean the difference between life and death.  

The US Army recently created a gender-neutral combat fitness test.  The result was that 10% of male US Army soldiers failed the test while 65% of female US Army soldiers failed the test.  A passing score is 360 out of 600 points.  The average score for female soldiers was roughly 100 points below the average for male soldiers.  As the results from the test impact promotion eligibility, the US Army is now reconsidering whether or not to have different scales/tests for men and women.

The point?

Men and women are different.  

Biologically.

Genetically.

Measurably.

Scientifically.

Documented.

Most of the world understands this truth.  This post is for those occasions when I run into the rare person that has a tough time accepting this reality.

----

A later update.  I ran across this graph a while back via the /dataisbeautiful group on Reddit.

They did a study of the grip strength of men and women of all ages, sizes, abilities, etc.  The net result was that men had a grip strength that was almost uniformly stronger than women of their cohort.  Grip strength is a reasonable proxy for overall strength. 

Methodology and some additional clarifications to the data at the link.  



Friday, March 5, 2021

Review: The Sword of Kaigen

The Sword of KaigenThe Sword of Kaigen by M.L. Wang
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This story takes place in a decidedly Asian setting. Character names frequently evoke a Japanese culture.

The story centers around an influential family that runs part of an empire. Their clan, the Matsura, has long been known for their fighting prowess. However, they are also quite provincial; preferring to stay close to their mountain and quietly run things.

Young Mamoru is trying to be worthy of his family's reputation by learning their fighting style. His mother, Misaki, had gone away to school at a modern university where she learned to fight. Women were not considered worthy to fight among the Matsura clan. His father is aloof and emotionally remote. Living his life in fulfillment of the role he plays rather than in the enjoyment of his family.

Eventually, conflict comes to their mountain and all of the Matsura must fight. When the battle is won by the narrowest of margins, the Empire comes to wipe away any evidence of the battle. Families are denied the right to mourn as their tradition dictates.

What changes await the Matsura clan at the end of this conflict? Who lives? Who dies? And who learns something new about themselves as well as those around them?

This book offers a number of contrasts; rural vs. urban, men vs. women, old vs. young, individual achievement vs. government policies, tradition vs. change. Just as in real life, there are no easy answers with simple solutions.

This book is a tour de force piece of fantasy fiction. It was the 2020 winner of the Self Published Fantasy Blog Off and establishes M.L. Wang as a force to be reckoned with in genre literature. Miss this book at your own peril.

View all my reviews

Review: Wolfwinter

WolfwinterWolfwinter by Lela E. Buis
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I picked up this book because a story by Lela Buis is included in the collection. All of the stories were entertaining if not precisely the most memorable. If you like werewolf stories, then this book is for you.

View all my reviews

Review: Hazardous Imaginings: The Mondo Book of Politically Incorrect Science Fiction

Hazardous Imaginings: The Mondo Book of Politically Incorrect Science FictionHazardous Imaginings: The Mondo Book of Politically Incorrect Science Fiction by Andrew Fox
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This book is billed as being the intellectual child of Harlan Ellison's "Dangerous Visions". I dropped out after the fourth story.

Essentially, the author was looking for an opportunity to say outrageous things for the purpose of saying outrageous things rather than to provoke readers to consider different perspectives.

Things started going decidedly downhill when the fourth story suggested that Christopher Columbus sailed west across the Atlantic to prove the world was round. Not quite. People had known that the world was round for centuries at that point. What was unknown what the planet looked like west of west where it finally meets the east.

It went on from there to set down a contorted storyline where the Jews end up loving Hitler.

See what I mean about being outrageous for the purpose of being outrageous.

The other stories that I read were decent, but not great. Mark this one as a collection with a lot of potential that didn't quite pan out.

View all my reviews

Thursday, February 18, 2021

Socialists Blink - Again

Venezuela has been mired in a death spiral created by socialist policies for decades.  This is not a rhetorical death spiral.  Socialist policies have taken what was one of the great economic success stories in the world and a beacon for Central and South American nations and turned it into a poverty-ravaged nation.  Malnutrition and poor healthcare have resulted in the deaths of thousands upon thousands of Venezuelans.

This result has always been perfectly predictable.

And now the government of Venezuela is taking a step back.  They are turning towards privatization of their economy to help their nation recover from Chavista politics. Now a change made today can always be unmade in the future.  The future for Venezuela could certainly be bright if they aggressively stepped back towards free markets.

This is just the latest example of how the solution to economic issues is free-market capitalism.  Sweden started the move away from socialist madness in the late 1980s and has been bounding forward ever since.  Lady Thatcher crucially set the UK free from such nonsense back then as well.  France recently tried to tax the super-rich only to watch those folks take their money and their economic activity elsewhere.  

Vietnam is a booming free-market economy even though the communists retain control of the government.  India gradually stepped away from an overly regulated system and towards free-markets.  China has made a similar shift away from a centralized economy over the last few decades.  The result of this global shift towards capitalism has been a reduction in the incidence of extreme poverty.

Nothing has done more to lift people out of poverty than free markets.

Welcome to the club, Venezuealans.  We hope you are here to stay.

Reflections Of A Former Dittohead - Rush Limbaugh RIP

July of 1988.  Running down the I-5 in California from MCB Camp Pendleton to MCAS El Toro in a little government-owned pickup truck.  Air conditioning?  Well, the windows roll down.  Radio?  AM only.

That was fine by me as I liked local AM radio stations.  I would listen to the local NPR call-in programs on my runs to El Toro.  A few years later I would be listening to Larry King's late-night radio program while working my second job delivering pizzas for Dominos.

At this point, I was a young Sergeant of Marines making a monthly (give or take) run to El Toro for office supplies*.  I had figured out years earlier that my life was going to depend on the wise actions of the United States Congress.  I had also figured out that the Democrats running the US House and who were periodically in charge of the US Senate were bereft of wisdom.

News reports that praised the latest national programs were frustrating for their lack of consideration for why past national programs had failed.  Equally frustrating was reporting on initiatives that were at best band-aids and at the worst created "unexpected consequences" that could have been predicted by anyone with a lick of common sense.  Such consequences caused problems greater than the initial initiative was intended to solve.  

Problems that would require yet another national program.  Predictably.  You can't just have Congresscritters sitting around doing nothing, can you?  [Spoiler - Sí se puede!]

In a sea of AM radio programming that ignorantly advocated for government action, Rush was a surprising breath of fresh air.  I was hooked.  I was a week 1 dittohead.

Fortunately, my various jobs allowed me time to listen to Rush while I was working.  I listened.  I also read.  A lot.  Ask my family.  My original blog was filled with things that I had researched to get the facts to support my positions.  Sometimes my positions changed as a result.

Rush suggested at one point that you have to listen to his show for months in order to understand it.  I would go a little further and suggest that you had to listen to his show for at least a couple of years to understand him.

Listening for just a day or a week isn't nearly enough.  Rush would gently roll a stink bomb down the aisle and then spend days or weeks riffing off of it to make a larger point.

He endorsed Bill Clinton for President in 1992.

For about 5 minutes.

He then denied that he had ever endorsed Mr. Clinton when he came back from the break.  He pointed out that whatever was said, it was in the past and had nothing to do with the current moment.  Rush had crystallized Bill Clinton's character, or lack thereof, in those few minutes.

But you had to listen to his show for months to understand that Rush's message was larger than a 5-minute gag.

Years of listening were needed to get through the showman front that Rush projected during his show.  You had to catch those moments when he would set aside the bravado and the persona and speak from his heart.  He truly wished every person to have the opportunity to experience themselves at their greatest abilities.  He understood that the most important part of that equation was the individual.  No government program is ever going to turn an underachiever into a success if that individual is unwilling to do the work that creates success.  No government program will deny success to an individual that is willing to put in the work to create success; although an awful lot of elected Democrats would like to try.

One of the better examples was his inspiration for Dan's Bake Sale.  Back in the day, Rush had a newsletter.  It cost $24 per year.  I didn't subscribe.  This guy "Dan" calls from Fort Collins, CO.  He says that he can't afford it, and would Rush just give him a subscription.

At the time, schools were holding bake sales for the ostensible purpose of raising money to fund schools.  Bill Clinton clucked his tongue over the tragedy of schools holding bake sales.  Eventually, some of the proceeds from those bake sales were sent to Bill Clinton because "Bill Clinton will fund schools".  Spoiler - Mr. Clinton kept the money and school funding wasn't changed.

Rush handed Dan a golden ticket.  He said "hold a bake sale" suggesting that he could raise enough money to purchase a subscription.  Essentially, do the work to earn the money and the subscription will be worth all that much more to you.

Dan from Fort Collins did just that.  And dittoheads jumped in.  With that kind of national exposure, everyone that was close to Fort Collins, and a great many who were not, wanted to participate.  Restauranteurs from New Orleans called Dan to see about setting up a booth so they could sell food.  The event exploded.

Dan sold out of cookies in no time flat.  He purchased his subscription.  And tens of thousands of people had a great day in Fort Collins, CO.  Imagine if Dan had stopped worrying about just selling cookies.  

Being handed a golden ticket is not a guarantee of success.  It is an opportunity.  What happens after that is up to the individual.

A second example would be the current Fox News personality, Tammy Bruce.  Tammy started out in radio broadcasting as a left-leaning feminist.  She was told that Rush was an awful person.  Then she met him and found out who he really was.  Her story is worth reading.

I stopped being a regular listener in roughly 2002 for a couple of reasons.  His bits didn't always land well.  A few years earlier he had done a bit about the dog that lived in the Whitehouse.  Chelsea Clinton's photo was used in the bit.  While few things were off-limits to Rush, this one should have been.  There were other examples.

By 2002 it was apparent that Rush was unwilling to pursue the fiscal conservativism that he had been preaching for roughly 15 years when Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate as well as a Republican as President.  The GOP in Congress was attempting to spend money like drunken sailors on shore leave.  Apologies to my Squiddly Diddly friends.  (Less than a decade later, Democrat politicians said "hold my beer".)  Rush elected not to criticize political friends over issues that he would regularly criticize politicians on the left.

Rush didn't hold the feet of elected Republicans to the fire.  We didn't get a balanced budget.  We didn't get any meaningful reduction in the number of federal agencies, departments, and assorted conclaves.

If he was unwilling to advocate for the same principles when his allies were in office and positioned to actually achieve those objectives, then perhaps my time was better spent elsewhere.  I have only listened to his show a few times a year since that time.

I've listened a little more frequently over the last year.  Rush announced that he had stage 4 lung cancer last January.  Every show might be his last.

I just happened to catch a show where he was in the studio just after Christmas.

Roughly half the nation is feeling hurt, bemoaning the coming Biden Presidency, caught up in all of the conflict raised in the wake of the election.

Rush reached for confidence.  He spoke of his love for America.  He expressed humble gratitude for the opportunities that he has received by living in a nation that stands for individual liberty.  He supported perseverance and opposed violent "revolution".

Rush happily advocated for doing the difficult work needed to foster an American vision of liberty that is rooted in our Constitution.  Making such a vision a reality would be sweeter for having done the right work rather than taking destructive shortcuts.

Rush Limbaugh knew that death walked but a few paces behind and chose to cheerfully encourage the rest of us to be better people in pursuit of better ends.

He long ago set my inquisitive mind free from the constraints imposed by media bias and popular culture.  This opportunity to consider all of the political options was his gift to me.  I hope when I die that others will not see that as a wasted opportunity.

Fair winds and following seas, Rush.  



*Those damned asterisks.  In the 1980s, there was no such thing as the Internet.  Military organizations couldn't just go to an office supply store for pens, paper, tape, etc.  A central organization bought such stuff and units were tasked with sending someone to get what was needed.  Office supplies were kept in a locked area to prevent pilfering.  It was my part-time job as an expediter.

Now the astute observer would note that MCB Camp Pendleton is located at the north end of San Diego County in California and that MCAS El Toro was (formerly) located near Irvine, California.  It was roughly a 45-60 minute drive from my command location to the El Toro office supply "store".  Why wouldn't I just go to the "store" on Camp Pendleton?

That would make too much sense.  The problem was that I was in the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing.  All of our funding flowed through the 3rd MAW.  Thus we were required to shop at the 3rd MAW office supply store.  The stores on Camp Pendleton were operated by the 1st Marine Division or by the base.  Wing units were not a part of either organization.

If you want to know why I mistrust the efficacy of government programs, I can only point to my experiences in the world's finest fighting force; the United States Marine Corps.  Congress mandates that the Corps operate according to rules that make Calvinball seem to make sense.  

And the American military is the most effective part of the US government!

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

Another Quilt for Shelly

There is an old bit of folklore that suggests that a cardinal visiting your yard is a loved one visiting from heaven.  My beloved bride likes that bit of folklore.

Personally, I've got questions.  Given that the range of the cardinal runs from the great plains states to the east coast and then south into parts of Mexico, what happens to all those people in the western United States?  Don't they get visitors from heaven? 

Range map of the Cardinalis cardinalis lineages.
Approximate distributions of mainland and island C. cardinalis lineages. An image of a male C. cardinalis igneus is shown.
Figure 1.  Range map of the Cardinalis cardinalis lineages.
Approximate distributions of mainland and island C. cardinalis lineages. An image of a male C. cardinalis igneus is shown.

I'll have to work on that later.  In the meantime, I found this fabric panel of cardinals in a winter forest at Mo's Needle and Thread in Portland, MI.  We love Mo and we love her store.  She conspired with me to get the panel into our bag without Shelly seeing it.

I already had a couple of cardinal themed fabrics in my stash along with some other wintry looking items.  Late last fall I finally had some time to work on building that panel into a quilt.  I didn't really have a pattern to follow so I just decided to wing it.  

Pun intended.

The plan was to make a series of 2" x 2" finished squares.  But I'm not big on single piecing when using strips is so much easier.  I made a bunch of 2 1/2" wide strips and sewed them together.  I then cut that assembly into 2 1/2" wide strips that ended up being a series of blocks.  On a couple of strips, I took one block off the end of a strip and added it to the other end; sort of like you do with a bargello quilt pattern.  I then arranged the block strips so that they were visually pleasing.

I added some half-square triangles and a couple of strips to make the corner pieces and then added a border strip.  Voila!  A complete top!

Click to embiggen

A closer view.  Click to embiggen

Corner detail.  Click to embiggen

Blocks.  Click to embiggen

As I was pulling fabrics out of the trunks, I was a bit surprised to see that I had actually purchased that panel a second time.  Must be Shelly and her cardinals were weighing on my mind.  I'm going with that interpretation.

Cardinal detail.  Click to...ah hell....you know.

Then things got just a little dicey.  I like using a cotton backing for my quilts.  Cotton is dimensionally stable.  My beloved bride always wants the back to be soft and cuddly.  She found some minky material that also had...you guessed it...cardinals.  The only problem is that minky will stretch when you are quilting everything together.

Over on Reddit, one of the contributors posted about using spray adhesive to stick stretchy materials to a layer of linen to keep them from stretching.  So I did that.  And the minky material was stretchy no more!

Lots more cardinals on the back!  Don't make me say it again.

I then took the top, batting, and back out to Sue Walz in Grass Lake.  She is The Village Quilter.  Her long arm set up will take the largest of quilts.  The pattern that she used is a feather pattern.  I figured that birds and feathers went together somehow.  Sue always does great work on the quilts that I bring her.

I almost forgot the most important part.  Here is a photo of the new quilt owner and her little helper.

Ella and Shelly.  I think they are both the cutest.


Hugo 2021 - Nomination Pool

It's that time of year when genre readers nominate their favorite works for the annual Hugo Awards.  My nominees follow.  Updates to be made as circumstances require.  I have one or two other properties that I might nominate for the Dramatic Presentation (Long) category.

If you love science fiction/fantasy works and want to see the best of those works be acknowledged, then please participate.  You can purchase a membership at the Discon III website.  Supporting members still get a chance to vote on this year's finalists and will be eligible to nominate for the 2022 awards.  Members generally get access to a great range of fiction in the voter's packets.

As always, please don't nominate anything that you haven't personally experienced.  

Novel

The Last Campaign - Martin L. Shoemaker - 47North
Scarlet Odyssey - C.T. Rwiz Rwizi - 47North

Short Story

I Sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter  — by ISABEL FALL — Clarkesworld Jan. 2020
Martial Arts Master - by Alan Baxter - Twitter

Novella

The Weight of the Air, The Weight of the World by T.R. Napper - from Neon Leviathan ~23,000 words

Dramatic Presentation (Long)

Locke & Key - Netflix
Warrior Nun - Netflix
October Faction - Netflix
Dracula - Netflix
The Mandolorian - Disney+ *

Editor - Short Fiction

Adrian Collins

Editor - Long Fiction

Adrian Collins

Semiprozine

Cirsova
Grimdark Magazine

Graphic Novel/Comic

XKCD

Fancast

Sincast by CinemaSins
The Disney Story Origins Podcast

Series

Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells
The Empires Corps by Christopher Nuttall


* In light of Disney Studios' canceling of Gina Carano, I feel disinclined to support their products.  I am uncomfortable with the larger changes to our society over the last 20 years.  Where once tolerance for diversity was perceived as a laudable benefit to advancing the human condition, we are no longer able to appreciate a diversity of opinion.

With respect to Science Fiction/Fantasy, I would prefer to appreciate a diversity of works while largely ignoring the personal behaviors of creators.  Ms. Carano's statements might be worthy of a critical response.  They are unworthy of terminating a creative relationship.

Should The Mandolorian make it to the final round, it would surely go below "no award" on my ballot.



Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Covid - One Year In

 A little more than a year ago, a colleague and I were noting the spread of Covid into the US.  We had been discussing the news out of China for more than a month.  Most of our friends and family didn't know what we were talking about, but we saw the potential for a larger spread of the disease.

Here the nation is a year later and Covid mutations are starting to spread.  The good news...fingers crossed...is that the vaccines coming out of Operation Warp Speed (I call them the Trump shots) generally provide protection against those mutations.  The bad news is that these mutated strains seem to be more contagious even if they aren't more deadly as a percentage of infected cases.

So taking some steps to control the spread of those mutations is probably a good idea.  What is the Biden administration's first step?  They ban people from entering the US from Europe and South Africa; the places where those mutations are currently running rampant.

What was the first step of the Trump administration one year ago?  To ban people from entering the US that had recently been to China.  He was called a racist.  Mayors of New York City and San Francisco encouraged large gatherings of people in their respective "Chinatowns".  Given the rapid spread of Covid in the New York City area, promoting large gatherings of people anywhere in that city was a dangerous choice.

Mr. Biden is now being praised for taking precisely the same public health step for which Mr. Trump was vilified.  Parenthetically, Hawaii has largely avoided Covid precisely because they have banned people from coming to Hawaii if they do not have a negative Covid test.  Mr. Trump's initial reaction to this disease has been validated many times, yet no one that called his reaction racist back then will be willing to retract that scurrilous accusation now.

Many people complained that Mr. Trump did not issue an executive order mandating nationwide use of masks.  While his administration did provide recommendations regarding social distancing and other measures, he did not put the force of law behind those recommendations.

During the fall campaign, Mr. Biden promised to issue executive orders on those topics.  Shortly after making those promises, he had to retract them. Why?

Because the President of the United States does not have the legal authority to issue such orders.  The President (or their administration) can issue recommendations, but they cannot legally mandate those kinds of public health orders.

The authority for those orders rests solely with the governors of the individual states.

Which President demonstrated the most respect for the constitutional limits on federal authority with respect to public health? Mr. Trump.

The Trump administration also established Operation Warp Speed to streamline the regulatory process associated with the development of new vaccines.  As a part of this program, the government offered upfront research funding as well as commitments to purchase vaccines before they had been validated by the testing process.  Companies researching those vaccines had the choice of accepting both, one or the other, or none of that fiscal backing.  

Ultimately, the first two successful vaccines were developed with some sort of financial backing from the US government.  Additionally, the modifications to the onerous FDA testing/evaluation process allowed those companies to create, test, and bring to the market two highly effective vaccines in less than a year.  All of the "experts" said it would take at least two years.

And finally, there is the preparation for the distribution of the vaccine.  The Trump administration began working with the various states to develop plans to get the vaccine doses where they needed to be in a timely fashion.  This effort began back in September.  The administration reviewed the state plans, evaluated them, pointed out potential problems, and worked with the states to improve their plans.

Each state was then responsible for properly executing those distribution plans.  Some states have done better than others both in planning and execution.  

And the result is that at the end of January, we are on track to have 100 million doses administered in the first 100 days of the Biden administration.  That simply doesn't happen without the competence of the Trump administration.

The point?  Every administration has had successes and failures.  While the Trump administration could have done better in a few areas, they have mostly been very successful at addressing Covid-19.  The Biden administration can't actually say that because it would undermine the media narrative that the Trump administration couldn't do anything correctly.

They could do things well, and in the case of Covid-19, then got most things right.  Given the choice between believing the media or your own lying eyes, take your lying eyes.

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

2020 Election Forward To 2021

 It has been a busy and tiring couple of months.  Keeping track of the cascade of claims about the 2020 election is a full-time job.  I already have a full-time job.  I finally have had some time to think and now have some time to write.  Get ready to be pissed.

First and foremost, Joe Biden won the Presidential election in 2020.  There is not sufficient credible information to undermine that conclusion.

I base that statement on four primary elements.

  1. Compared with 2016, Donald Trump's percentage of the vote in urban areas largely went up.  As an example, his percentage of the vote went up in Detroit.  While it is true that more people voted overall, a greater percentage of voters supported Donald Trump in Detroit.  Compared with 2016, Donald Trump's percentage of the vote in non-urban areas went down.  Stick a pin in this for a minute.
  2. His legal team is something like 1 and 54 in court.  These courts include many conservative judges.  Absolutely none of those courts has granted relief to alter any of the votes that will soon be cast in the Electoral College.  If Clarence Thomas wasn't prepared to overturn the election, then there simply isn't justification for pursuing those legal cases. [update below]
  3. His legal team is either lying or incompetent.  They stand on the front steps of a courthouse (or landscaping company, you pick) making grand pronouncements about possessing sufficient proof of fraud to overturn an election, declaring that there are tens of thousands of illegitimate votes, and then go in front of a judge to claim that there are dozens or maybe hundreds of questionable votes.  Either they lack the competence to accurately describe the evidence they are about to bring to court, or they are lying.  For some of these people, notably Rudy Guiliani, this is a terribly disappointing end to their careers.
  4. Donald Trump gained support in every demographic category except one; white men.  As a matter of percentage of votes, Donald Trump improved among blacks, latinos, Asians, and women.  He lost support from white men.  Stick a pin in this for a minute.
Joe Biden is going to be our legitimately elected President after 20 January 2021.  Joe Biden will be my President.

Now accepting the legitimacy of his election does not mean accepting his agenda nor accepting the Democrat's party platform.  I believe that giving Joe Biden the Presidency will result in harm to the Republic.  He lacks the will to counter the socialist and identitarian elements that dominate the Democrat Party.  While he has recently spoken out against the excessive use of Executive Orders, he has also indicated that he wants to undo most of Mr. Trump's EOs.  Most of Mr. Trump's EOs were focused on repealing Mr. Obama's EOs.  And the vast majority of Mr. Obama's EOs were hot anti-Constitutional garbage.

While I will accept Joe Biden as the legitimate President, I will reserve my right to vigorously oppose any of his administration's policies that would appear to risk harm to the Republic.  I'm guessing that I will be opposing most of them because the modern Democrat agenda is mostly harmful to a Republic dedicated to the defense and extension of individual liberty.

We should pause for a moment to point out that this process was made more difficult by the behavior of many Democrat politicians and leaders in 2016.  Hillary Clinton may have technically conceded the election, but she spent the next four years claiming that Mr. Trump's Presidency was not legitimate.  Many elected Democrats declined to attend his inaugural.  Democrat leaders took the unprecedented step of organizing protests on the day of Mr. Trump's inauguration to declare his Presidency illegitimate.

Anyone that participated in that unconscionable behavior and has not since recanted and made appropriate apologies is part of the problem.  By failing to exhibit traditional American behavior of accepting an electoral loss in 2016, they have legitimatized the current efforts from the right to reject the licit election of Joe Biden.

Being opposed to Trump administration policies is one thing.  Attempting to deny that Mr. Trump won the 2016 election is an entirely different beast that only served to undermine our Republic.

And let's be clear, a "they did it first" defense stinks.  It's a fourth-grade level justification at best with sincere apologies to fourth graders everywhere.  I am not suggesting that the current activities are appropriate because Democrat politicians went there first.  I am aggressively asserting that if no one violates traditional norms, then we never have to deal with these problems in the first place.

As Democrat politicians have been demonstrating new and untried methods for violating political norms for my entire adult life, I simply don't have much sympathy when they now discover that those same norms are useful.  They simply must be able to support those political norms all the time and not just when it is convenient for their position.

I have seen far too many examples of unrestrained rhetoric from my friends on the right since the election.  They are citing the old saw about there being three boxes critical to democracy and individual liberty; the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammo box.

And again, let's be clear, the ballot box is currently trending towards those of us in the libertarian and/or conservative end of the world.  As Senator Ben Sasse is fond of observing, we are a center-right nation.

Everyone assumed that the House would swing even harder towards the Democrats.  It almost swung back to GOP control.

Everyone assumed that the Senate would flip to Democrat control and that the margin would be at least by 2-3.  Instead, we may have a tied Senate and perhaps might even keep GOP control which would act as a brake on the Democrats' demonstrably harmful agenda.  (It's now late on the day of the run-off election.  Man - nailbiter!)

Everyone assumed that Joe Biden would win in a landslide.  A landslide occurs when a candidate gets 70%+ of the electoral votes; roughly 375.  Joe Biden won 306 electoral college votes.  Pretty much a squeaker of a win.

Getting back to those "pinned" items above, we had a greater percentage of non-white males voting for the GOP than has happened in decades.  Donald Trump was apparently so racist that all those POC were willing to vote for him in relatively large numbers.

So here's the big question.  How do we build on that?

Do we hold our collective breath until our faces turn blue?  Or do we welcome those voters into the conservative/libertarian fold?  The latter is reaching for the ballot box.

Do we hold onto a marginal person who refuses to acknowledge that he lost an election or do we pursue a positive agenda?  The latter is reaching for the ballot box.

Here's the thing.  I've watched this happen before.  Militiagan was a thing back in the 1990s.  You know what those guys never did?

  • Put on some slacks and a nice polo shirt.  Trim their beards.
  • Volunteer to work for their local Republican party organization.
  • Donate money to the GOP (think Georgia would be in doubt tonight if every Trump voter had donated the cost of a box of ammo to that campaign?)
  • Donate money to organizations doing the hard work of research and issue advocacy.  i.e. The American Enterprise Institute, Reason Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, Cato, etc.
  • Donate money to groups like The Federalist Society that promote concepts of individual liberty and an originalist reading of the US Constitution.
  • Subscribe to magazines and newspapers that report on the news that is routinely ignored by the mainstream media.  i.e. Reason Magazine, National Review, Wall Street Journal
  • Actually read those periodicals so they will be armed with the facts.
I had the privilege of listening to Rush Limbaugh during the Christmas break.  It was only for about half an hour during my lunchtime.  I have not listened to his show in close to a decade.

For those that don't know, Rush has stage 4 lung cancer.  He was diagnosed last January and was told that he wouldn't be alive come summer.  But the treatments seem to be working to slow down the progression of the disease.  

As I understand it, his show has a great many guest hosts these days.  He hosts the show when he is physically up to the task.

What did I hear?  I heard what made me a week one regular listener.  I heard gratitude for the opportunities he has had.  I heard appreciation for the continuing support of his fans.  I heard a man grateful to be an American.  I heard confidence for the future of America; a future he simply will not live to see.

When is it time to give up on America?  When is it time to abandon the American experiment in exceptional governance?

According to the man with weeks and maybe months to live, the answer is "never".

We build and we build.  We win when we can and we are largely winning today even if the 2020 election ends up being a bit of a setback.  We build and we win.  When we lose we regroup and we build.

If the Constitution is to be destroyed, if free speech, the right to keep and bear arms, the right to a jury trial, the right to equal treatment before the law are to be stripped from our nation, let Democrat politicians be the ones to do it.

Let the rest of us defend the Constitution as written and amended.  Let the rest of us defend federalism that allows individual states to craft laws based on the needs and desires of their citizens.

Let the ones that don't believe in the Constitution be the ones to fire the first shots.  History suggests that those that shoot first are almost always the ones that lose the most.

[update from above] The various court cases have proceeded.  Of the 23 cases decided on the merits, Mr. Trump and/or the GOP have won 16.  [as of 3/26/2021]  My understanding of those cases is that very few (if any) of them are sufficient to alter the outcome of a state's election.  Mr. Trump lost each state by far more ballots than are challenged by each suit.

Pennsylvania is the only state where it might come close.  But once they mixed the challenged ballots in with the fully legal ballots, the only recourse would have been to invalidate their electors.  That would have reduced the total number of electoral votes required to win and Mr. Biden still had the electoral votes.  [people that think that the result was to flip the state's electoral votes to Mr. Trump are mistaken]

But for those that think the 2020 elections were without blemish, you are entitled to your opinion.  The facts don't support that conclusion.

Sunday, December 20, 2020

What Does A Quilt Cost

 A friend asked a question of me that I had not heard before.  They asked if I was accepting orders for quilts.  The short answer to that question is "no", but there is a longer answer.

I have read about other quilters opening up the possibility of creating a quilt in exchange for cash.  The responses to the associated costs are generally a sense of shock with a sprinkling of outrage.  When the costs of a quilt get broken down, it suddenly becomes a less attractive option.

Most of my quilts are created for babies. They measure a little under 5 feet by 5 feet.  That works out to 25 square feet or roughly 2.8 square yards.  

Most fabric comes on a bolt that is close to 40" wide; that a bit over 1 yard.  We can talk about yards of material as a linear measurement or an area measurement and the result is essentially the same.

For most of those baby quilts, I buy somewhere between 4 and 5 yards of material.  I buy material on sale when I can get it.  I also know a couple of online stores where I can get pretty good prices from time to time.  But there are also times when I pay FLEET pricing; Full List Each and Every Time.  As a gross average, let's use $10 per yard of material.  That works out to $50 for just the material to make the top.

Then there is batting that goes in the middle.  I generally get it on sale.  Using $15 per yard, then we have another $30 as you always get a little more than you really need.

Finally, there is the backing material.  Due to the size of the quilts, you have to use a wider material width.  Those easily run $12 per yard and sometimes more.  There is another $24 in material cost.

The total fabric cost then runs to roughly $100.  That doesn't include thread or any of the other consumable supplies.  It also doesn't cover the cost of time.  A baby quilt takes me roughly 20 hours to complete.  What is the value of my time based on the quality of work that I do? 

Consider that fast food joints in my area are hiring people with no experience at $10 per hour.  Consider that shops are hiring people in my area with no experience at $14-16 per hour.  There are costs (i.e. employers portion of the payroll taxes, etc.) on top of that.

I've made over 20 quilts and learned a bit on each one.  Mostly I've learned what not to do, but that is another story.

While my work won't win any awards, it's also not exactly beginner level work either.  I'd feel pretty good about asking for $20 per hour or about $400 for a baby quilt for labor.  That makes the total about $500.  

If we are talking about a queen or king-sized quilt, then you end up multiplying that by at least 3.  It's a lot of work and material!

And that is why I give quilts away.  I know I've done my level best and have provided them with a visually interesting piece of work.  It's the one part of the process that is mine to control.  I don't have to put a price tag on the quilt.  The kind words of thanks and stories about the kids that grew up dragging their quilts around the house are more valuable to me than the cost of the materials and time spent making them.

If I start doing it for money, then the entire activity becomes something else.  Something that has to be justified rather than appreciated. 


Friday, December 18, 2020

A Quilt for Tracy

 This one won't go on Facebook until late in 2021.  Why?  Because my sister-in-law won't receive it until Christmas of 2021.  Don't ask me.  I just make 'em.

My beloved bride wanted me to make a quilt for my sister-in-law, Tracy.  She found some Michigan State fabric.  Apparently, Tracy is a fan.  Who knew!

I wasn't sure what I wanted to make and as time was short at the end of the year, I opted for a pretty standard approach.  I used a solid block of material alternated with a 9-patch of fabrics.  

We had four different fabrics.  I created a mix of three-square strips and then semi-randomly assembled sets of those strips into a 9-patch.

The result was pretty easy as well as visually interesting.




Now my beloved bride always thinks that the back of a quilt should be "soft".  "Soft" fabrics like flannel or fleece are a bear to work with as they aren't dimensionally stable.  They will stretch if pulled.  A stretch back means that the front will pucker when the back is allowed to relax.  Alternatively, if you don't have enough tension on the back, then it will pucker.

I'm not terribly happy with the back on this quilt.


In any case, don't anyone tell Tracy. We wouldn't want to ruin next year's Christmas for her!

A modest update.  Christmas 2021 came and went with the quilt not being presented.  Why, you may well ask.  Because I found out late in the season that a quilt was also needed for my other sister-in-law, Holly.  I just didn't have the time to get that second quilt completed.

But this is a new year and quilts have been gifted.  Here is Tracy with hers.

Tracy with her quilt.  Click to embiggen.









A Quilt for Baby Rose

 Another nephew and his beloved bride decided to have a baby this year.  They are doing it the old-fashioned way and are waiting for the doctor to tell them if the baby has a port or a dongle after the little squab has been delivered.  Those crazy kids.

I had my eye on the fabrics in this quilt right about the time that I had time to work on a new quilt.  I have also been aching to produce a quilt using Joe Cunningham's "Rock the Block - Album Style" approach.  Joe doesn't really teach a pattern as much as he teaches a concept of artistic discovery.  He has a class on Craftsy.  It's actually a class that presents four different variations on a general approach.  It's a very good value if you are into quilting and want to expand beyond just following someone else's pattern.

I used a bit of this general technique on the quilt that I made for young Lincoln earlier this year.  But now I've had a chance to use Joe's approach on a complete quilt.

The fabrics come from a series by Wilmington Essentials called Gems Bubble Up.  If you look close, you can see the bubbles.  They're everywhere!

I did try to do a little free-hand quilting.  It didn't turn out very nice.  So I went back to the old standby...straight lines!



I learned a couple things this time around.  One is to be careful about using too many narrow strips.  If you buy the class, you'll know what I'm talking about.  There is such a thing as too many narrow strips just as there is such a thing as too many wide strips.

I also learned to mix it up a bit.  I made a bunch of sections with narrower strips and a bunch of sections with somewhat wider strips.  Then when it came time to put things together, I tried to put the two sections together to generate some unusual patterns.

Lastly, make lots of extra pieces. I thought I had way too much fabric.  It turns out I barely had enough.  I was hoping to have some extras so that I could play around with the pieces when it came time to put them together.  Not having a stack of spares restricted my results.

My next quilt will probably use some of the techniques that I used in this quilt.  I found an image.  I have a plan.  Y'all will have to wait and see!

A Quilt For Kingston

 Our nephew and his girlfriend decided to bifurcate this year.  As one does, one makes a quilt!

As luck would have it, we made a run to Indiana earlier this year.  This was in late May and the lockdown had gotten us down.  Indiana was open for business.  We hopped over the border to do a little shopping and to have some dinner in a restaurant.

While out and about, we found a little hole-in-the-wall Joann's.  It was easily the smallest Joann's that I've ever seen.  And I've seen a few, too!

While wandering around the fabric, we came across the two fabrics that were used for this quilt.  We had no idea how it would get used or who would be getting it.  We didn't even know about our nephew's pending baby.



Lo and behold we got the news a couple months later.  For a change, I didn't have to run off to find fabric as we already had it in inventory.

As things worked out, the quilt was delivered a bit before Kingston.  Our nephew and his girlfriend do good work.


Welcome to the family, King!

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Review: Hammer and Tongs and a Rusty Nail

Hammer and Tongs and a Rusty NailHammer and Tongs and a Rusty Nail by Ian Tregillis
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1-star review. That accurately reflects my experience.

As this is really just a short story, the review will be equally short.

Tor published this short story that is part of George R.R. Martin's "Wild Cards" universe. I made it 20% of the way through before stopping. At that point, I really didn't care about the characters and really didn't have a great idea of their abilities or limitations. I've enjoyed all of the other Wild Cards stories I've ever read.

I might have continued on and given this a 2 or a 3-star rating. But the publisher and their copyeditor didn't show up for this project. It seemed like there was a spelling issue on every other page. Mostly just missing spaces that were needed to split up two words that had mistakenly conjoined.

The author didn't care enough to run spell-check. The editor didn't care enough to do the same thing. Avoid this story and move onto the next.

View all my reviews

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Review: Soulsmith

Soulsmith Soulsmith by Will Wight
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review which is a reasonable measure of my experience.

I read the first book in the series a couple of years ago. The narrative of the second book in the series picks up as if the reader is going immediately from the first book to the second. Rather than being a series of books, it appears that the author intends to write a single, long book.

I simply had no engagement with the characters in the first few chapters that I read. So I'm passing on the rest of the series.

View all my reviews

Sunday, November 1, 2020

Donald Trump 2020

Please join me in a brief trip back in time to 2016. The two dominant candidates for President were Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. At the time, I considered Donald Trump to be ineligible as a matter of character and experience for my vote for that high office. He had no useful government experience and his character...well it wasn't good.

The same was true about Hillary Clinton; her record in public office is abysmal and her character...again, not good.

So I voted for a candidate that did have a record of success in office and was of good character; Gary Johnson. I still think America would be a better place in 2020 if he had been elected.

Jumping back to a few days before election day, what do we have.

Donald Trump, whose character remains...not good. Anyone who read his book "The Art of The Deal" would instantly recognize the egotism that has been at the center of the Presidency for almost four years. He believed then and he believes today that if he thinks something is a good idea, then everyone should believe it is a good idea. He governs from his gut. We have been fortunate in that his gut is occasionally aligned with the interests of the American people.

While his character hasn't changed, his experience in office has certainly changed. While we cast our votes for the candidate, in reality, we are voting for the team that will form their administration. And the Trump administration has been reasonably successful at producing policies that are in the interests of the American people.

The following is in no particular order and some of these items may well overlap.

The Good
  • NATO - NATO lived for decades under the American defensive umbrella. After the fall of the Iron Curtain, NATO countries began to skimp on their commitment to the alliance. Mr. Obama complained about the same issue. Mr. Trump did something productive to get the individual nations to increase their defense spending. He also re-aligned our deployment posture in Europe to better contain Russia.
  • Iran - Mr. Trump got us out of that disastrous "deal" that allowed Iran to develop a nuclear weapons capability and re-instituted sanctions that will hopefully undermine the theocrats and give the Iranian people a shot at having a civilized government. He also put the Iranian regime on notice that targeting our troops in Iraq was unacceptable behavior by targeting General Sulemani.
  • ISIS/ISIL - After the US struggled for 8 years of feckless leadership under Mr. Obama, Mr. Trump made the moves necessary to put down ISIS in about 6 months.
  • Israel - Given that the various terrorist (or terrorist adjacent) organizations that run the PA, it was time for the region to move on. The administration has brokered a series of peace deals that will hopefully foster long-lasting peace in the region. If Mr. Trump were a Democrat, the Nobel committee would be grasping for ways to award him multiple Peace Prizes in one year.
  • Taxes - He led the effort to cut middle-class taxes. He cut corporate taxes making America a competitive option for corporations which in turn means more American jobs. He capped SALT deductions for the rich.
  • Constitution and Laws - Oddly enough Mr. Trump has moved the government back towards operating under a Constitutional constraint. He is enforcing laws passed by Congress and he is undoing anti-Constitutional directives from past Presidents. For the last ~20 years, American law has expected that our embassy in Israel would be located in the Israeli capital of Jerusalem. Mr. Trump made it happen. For the last ~30 years, American law has expected the government to collect those who enter/stay in our country [illegally] and send them home. There is no allowance for Presidential whims. The Trump administration enforced the law as written and passed. He even supported a change in our immigration policies by suggesting that Congress do its job and pass a new immigration law. We do not need any more Presidential "pen and phone" activities. We need Congress to assert its rightful place by passing detailed laws which are then enforced by the administration.
  • Supreme Court - I'm frankly tickled pink by two of his three successful nominations to the Supreme Court. Neal Gorsuch has a demonstrable small "l" libertarian streak. I think Justice Kavanaugh has a similar temperament. It's too early to know about Justice Coney-Barrett, but it looks like she will be a third Trump appointee that is solidly in support of the Constitution as written and amended. It is a document that was written to constrain government power with an expansive view towards the liberty of the individual. Coupled with Justice Thomas, we might finally have a court that will take a stand against the modern administrative state and force Congress to do its job, legislate, and restrain any administration from using Presidential edicts as a means of creating new laws out of whole cloth. For those that don't want a "strong man" style President to run free in the country, a Supreme Court populated with originalists is your best defense.
  • Regulations - Mr. Trump established that any agency seeking to create a new regulation had to identify two old regulations to be eliminated. The net result is that business activity increased in this modestly reduced regulatory environment.
  • The Economy - Prior to Covid, the economy was running great. The Obama administration told us that 6% unemployment and 1-2% annual GDP growth was as good as it was going to get for the foreseeable future. Due in part to the administration's tax and regulatory policies, unemployment ended up close to 3.5% with the lowest black and hispanic unemployment since those statistics were first measured. GDP growth was over 2%. And, most importantly, the income of the bottom quintile started going up faster than that of the upper quintile. That hasn't happened in decades.
  • Veterans - Under the prior administration, the Veterans Administration was killing veterans via neglect. Bonuses were being paid based on budget compliance rather than on how effectively veterans' health issues were being resolved. The VA is currently far better. Further improvements can and should be made. It is also obvious that the current administration is focused on serving veterans rather than considering them to be a budgetary liability.
  • The Media - While not an unvarnished success, he...or more correctly his various spokespersons...have had a pretty good record of pointing out the inconsistencies in the reporting by most of the major media organizations. In particular, Kayleigh McEnany and her binder of past news stories have been a godsend. The media is, on average, far to the left of the average American. They stopped with any pretense of reporting news in a non-partisan manner decades ago. Someone needs to point that out. As a big plus, while Mr. Trump has been verbally abusive towards the press, he has never sent federal agents to investigate reporters as was more common in the Mr. Obama's administration.
The Meh

  • Iraq/Syria/Afghanistan - Let's be honest, those countries are a geopolitical mess. I can't say that Mr. Trump made any substantive progress, but he hasn't taken those nations backward. Those nations are independent actors and there are simply times when even the President of the United States is unable to move things in a positive direction. That is particularly true when other actors (i.e. Iran, Turkey, and Russia) are seeking to influence things in a different direction.
  • North Korea - Mr. Trump's hot and cold diplomacy ran from brinkmanship to near fawning of Kim Jong Il. The result did little to change North Korea's relationship with the rest of the world. He tried. Every President tries. He fared no better and no worse than the rest.
  • Trade - This is a bit of a mix. On the one hand, he did get some modest concessions from Mexico and Canada in the USMCA deal. And his use of tariffs has somewhat moderated China's behavior. Those aren't big successes, but they are successes. On the flip side, the tariffs have taken more out of American pockets due to increases in the cost of imports. The trade deficit hasn't changed and may have gotten slightly worse. I'll give him credit for trying to correct the severe imbalance in our trade relationships around the world. Past administrations did a poor job of negotiating those deals. Mr. Trump simply wasn't able to do accomplish anymore.
  • Border/Immigration - This has been a bit of a mixed bag. Illegal immigration has slowed somewhat. The child separation process was conducted in a ham-handed manner. Separating children to ensure that they are not being trafficked is a sound objective. Failing to adequately document who those children were with so they could be returned to their legitimate parents once the parents were sent home was a failure. Simply failing to document the disposition of their cases in a transparent manner was a public relations failure.
The Bad

  • Corona Virus - While a bit of a mixed bag, there is just far too much negative for this to go in the Meh bag. Mr. Trump has done some things well. Shutting down immigration from China early on was a sound and productive step. His task force focused on getting ventilator production up to speed. He had the military supplement overwhelmed hospitals for the 1-2 month period where such support was critical. His administration has moved several solutions for a vaccine quickly down the development process so that we might all put this contagion behind us. But...
    • he remains focused on the economy to the detriment of all other concerns. Having a job is great. Being alive to work that job is a bit more important.
    • In the early days of the virus, the CDC and FDA insisted on running their standard playbook rather than using the proven testing regimes from Europe or South Korea. In that crucial period where we fell far behind in testing, we needed more Trump, and we go got less.
    • In the early days, we were told that masks were not effective. That was a lie told to prevent people from buying up all of the masks (N95 and otherwise) that were going to be sorely needed in various healthcare settings. He should have made those FDA and CDC bureaucrats tell the truth; masks work to varying degrees but are most needed elsewhere. He could have made it patriotic to wear a less effective homemade mask, but he didn't.
    • There is probably a whole other essay in the wings about the effectiveness of various masks. What isn't in question is that N95 masks work. While the government accelerated the production of ventilators and vaccines, I've seen no real effort to increase the American production of N95 masks. They should be so plentiful that they should have been sold at every street corner convenience store at half the pre-Covid price. There should be official government videos playing to demonstrate how they are effectively fitted to individual users. Government notices to "cover the nose AND mouth" should routinely be a part of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, etc. advertising.
    The sad truth is that Mr. Trump missed so many opportunities to easily improve the Covid problem. And he missed all of them.
  • Character - Donald Trump lacks character. His history of womanizing (to say the least) and serial infidelities marks him as a person who can (and probably will) turn on anyone who trusts him.

    His business acumen is correctly described as patchwork at best. He borrows large sums for his businesses, takes a hefty cut for himself, and then leaves the investors holding the bag when the company goes into bankruptcy. Again, and again, and again.

    While many criticize Mr. Trump for his crude and boorish statements/tweets, I think the larger problem is his utter lack of strategy. A President can be crude from time to time, but it should be done with an eye towards a larger purpose. As an example, sticking his rhetorical thumb in the eye of the media is sorely needed from time to time. Labeling every news piece that describes him or his administration critically as "fake news" devalues the meaning of words like "fact" and "truth". Donald Trump is pointlessly crude and someone needs to [take away his Twitter account.]

    His random positions and odd statements made it so that men of high character could not serve in the administration in good conscience. If people like Jim Mattis and John Kelly couldn't be convinced to stay, then there is a serious problem in the Whitehouse.
This Was Avoidable

We didn't have to be in the current situation. Jim Webb ran for the Presidency in 2016. Rather than supporting a true moderate with sound character and a successful record in public office, the Democrats went for Hillary Clinton. In 2016, I would have gladly considered voting for Jim Webb instead of Gary Johnson.

Rather than come back to the middle in 2020 and run a true American unity ticket, the Democrats ran a slate of leftists. Joe Biden has never been a centrist. He has always been in the center of the Democrat party. Given that the Democrat party has been infiltrated by people that share more ideology with the World Workers Party than anyone else, the leftward drift of the Democrats has pulled old Joe leftward. Their influence is reflected in their party platform which is about as far left as that party has ever been in my lifetime.

Joe Biden, personally, is suspect. If the phrase "appearance of impropriety" is to have any useful meaning, then the revelations about his and Hunter's activities should be sufficient to have excluded him from consideration by the Democrats. Add to that the obvious signs that Mr. Biden is beginning to show some signs of his age. Add to that his counterproductive record as a legislator. Joe Biden was ineligible for my vote in 1988 because he was a typical gaffe-prone legislator. Now he is much older and certainly not nearly as sharp.

Kamala Harris is another politician that has just been wrong on the issues for far too long. As a prosecutor, she put tens of thousands of minorities behind bars for marijuana possession. Now she laughs off marijuana as a non-issue without bothering to apologize for her past actions. Her office withheld exculpatory evidence in a serious felony case. And she willingly participated in the calculated smear campaign against Brett Kavanaugh.

There were far too many other options on the table. While I might not have voted for any of these, I probably would have followed up on 2016 with a 2020 vote for the Libertarian candidate as a centrist Democrat would not have been demonstrably worse. Had Mr. Biden opted for a centrist as his VP, I could have voted for a third-party candidate as I doubt he will finish out his term in office.

Tulsi Gabbard was interesting; at the very least respectable. Deval Patrick has a history of working across the proverbial aisle. Andrew Yang brought a fresh perspective to the race. Even John Hickenlooper might have been able to pull off an interesting race for the Whitehouse. I would have considered voting for some of these candidates. At the very least I would have supported a third-party nominee as being closer to who I want in office without risking grave damage to our Republic.

I will be voting for a split ticket on Tuesday. There are a few Democrats running for local offices that I think can be trusted to execute the duties of those offices properly. There are a couple of Republicans that I simply cannot vote for based on their past actions.

And I will be voting for Donald Trump for President. Not because I think he is a stellar candidate. Not because he is fitting to stand amongst leaders like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Reagan, Coolidge, Lincoln, Kennedy, and Truman.

However, letting the modern Democrats have any more power in the federal government is not a responsible option for the preservation of the Republic. This is strictly a defensive vote based on avoiding policies that would be more harmful to our country than Donald Trump's demonstrably deficient character.

Let them toss the socialists back into the World Workers Party, abandon their modern identitarian focus, re-tool their policies so that they serve all Americans, and talk to me again in 4 years.

[Modest edits 12/18/2020] [and on 5/20/2021] [and 10/2/2023]

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Review: Battle Born: Lapis Lazuli

Battle Born: Lapis Lazuli Battle Born: Lapis Lazuli by Maximilian Uriarte
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

If you thought that Max's The White Donkey was good, then get ready. This new book is a tour de force view of the Marine Corps, the war in Afghanistan, and how there isn't any situation that is defined by a single feature.

The artwork is gorgeous. Pages will go by with subtle and meaningful shifts in the image that heighten the tension of the story without a single word on any page.

The dialog is tight and accurate. The story covers many aspects of life in general as well as life in the Corps in particular.

This is the single best graphic work to be issued this year.

Do....no.....miss....it.

View all my reviews