Tuesday, February 22, 2022
Review: Son of the Black Sword
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Our protagonist is Ashok Vadal. Presumably born of the highest/first caste in society. Dispassionate and masterful enforcer of The Law. Possessor/wielder of a magic blade that lends him the collected experience of those that have wielded the blade in past centuries.
A perfect example of all that is right in his world.
Until he finds out that his life is a lie. His world is tipped upside down.
[hit the links back to Goodreads to read the spoiler section]
Son of the Black Sword is an interesting meditation on several contemporary issues. Is "the law" always right? Is it always just? Do people have a right to exist?
The first 10-15% of the book reads like a standard fantasy tale. Then the world turns upside down and you won't be able to put it down until you reach the end.
This book should have been a contender for the 2016 Hugo Best Novel award. Had I read it in 2015, I'm sure it would have been on my nominating ballot. I had one finalist below "no award" that year. This would have been a fine addition to the group of finalists.
View all my reviews
Monday, February 21, 2022
An Old Sea Tale - Putting Ivan Back In His Place
I ran across this via Usenet a while back. It seems like a piece of Navy history that shouldn't be lost to the vagaries of time and the Internet.
The author/storyteller is a retired US Navy Captain. The time is 1968 during the Cold War. The place is the Mediterranian where Soviet trawlers were trying to intercept our electronic transmissions while simultaneously committing acts of low-level harassment.
One US aircraft carrier, the Forrestal, was on-station in the Med when the following occurred. (With one or two edits by yours truly for formatting purposes only.)
---
A true one experienced by Frenchy Corbeille USN(Ret)
It was Sunday afternoon, early in the month of August, 1968 when USS Forrestal (CVA-59) was making her way through the Western Mediterranean during the first days of a 7-month cruise.
I was Officer of the Deck (OOD) on the 1200 - 1600 bridge watch, there were no ship's evolutions ongoing, and things looked like a "ho-hum" Sunday afternoon at sea. We were hosting the prospective Commanding Officer of USS Independence and our CO had gone with him to the Captain's In-Port Cabin. Prior to departing the bridge the CO and I had conversed briefly and one of the subjects breeched was that we had been in the Mediterranean for more than a week now and we had not yet seen one of those pesky Russian trawlers. Our Navy had come to hope not to see one because they had a way of getting in the way whenever we had things to do, such as flight operations, or underway replenishment. This lack of encounter was about to change.
At about 1500 I called the CO to advise him that we had picked up an unidentified surface contact on radar, range 22,000 yards (11 nautical miles). It appeared to be on our reciprocal course at a speed of 8 knots and in the absence of any changes, the closest point of approach (CPA) would be 6,000 yards on our port beam. "Very Well" and the customary "Thanks, Frenchy" constituted the CO's response.
I had no more than hung up the phone when the contact changed course. I could identify 2 sticks over the horizon, looking through the 7X50 OOD standard equipment Bausch & Lomb's, but could make out nothing of the vessel. However, the two sticks bore a strong resemblance to the pictures we had on the bridge of known trawlers that had frequented these waters. I called the captain back to advise him that the unidentified contact had indeed made a 90-degree course change, was still doing 8 knots, and his present course/speed would take him across our bow at 6,000 yards (3 miles). We were doing 20 knots, on some kind of a "sustained speed exercise" for the engineers, and preferred to alter neither course nor speed unless absolutely necessary. I advised the captain of my suspicions concerning the vessel's identity and advised him that I had ordered the Intelligence sighting team to the bridge. It being a Sunday stand down with little to occupy the idle time, we soon had the entire Intelligence staff scattered about on the bridge and the signal bridge, with a few photo types thrown in.
The contact was still hull-down over the horizon but the visible masts more and more took on the resemblance of our Russian trawler pictures. I also advised the captain that, in accordance with the International Rules of the Road, Forrestal was the privileged vessel; the vessel crossing our bow was coming from our port side and was therefore the "Burdened" vessel. In accordance with the Rules, the privileged vessel is REQUIRED to maintain course and speed. The Burdened vessel is responsible for maneuvering as necessary to avoid collision. The Captain said "Very Well, Call me back if he does anything funny, and let me know what the intelligence folks come up with."
Only moments later I was back on the phone, advising the Captain that we had positive ID on a Russian ELINT (Electronics Intelligence) trawler, and he had indeed done something "funny" - He had reached our intended track at a range of 6,000 yards, and had then executed another 90-degree turn to port; he was now on the same course as Forrestal, dead ahead, at speed 8 knots. So we had a 12-kt speed advantage, and 3 miles to contact. That meant that in 15 minutes one or the other of us must turn or he, the Russian trawler, would get run over. I advised the captain that in accordance with the International Rules, he was burdened when he came in from our port bow. Now that we are on a course to overtake him, he would like us to believe that Forrestal, as the overtaking vessel, is the newly ordained BURDENED vessel. I reminded the captain of another clause in the rules that says once a vessel is burdened, it may not maneuver to shift the burden to the other vessel. He stays burdened until danger of collision is past.
The captain agreed with my assessment and asked what I recommended we do. I recommended we hold course and speed until "EXTREMIS" - that sketchy point at which somebody has to do something or there's going to be a crunch, then order up "All Back Emergency Full", "Right Full Rudder", and we would miss him. I had identified that point as 400 yards astern but threw in 100 yards for cushion. The captain once more came back with his cheerful "Very Well" and added "if he's still there at 1,000 yards, give me a call back." "AYE AYE, Sir!"
Now we've eaten up about 1/3 of our cushion and the squawk box came to life. "Bridge, Flag Bridge" "When does Forrestal intend to maneuver to avoid that Privileged vessel ahead?" There was no race by other members of the bridge team to answer that one, so I got it myself. "Flag Bridge, Bridge - This is the Officer of the Deck speaking. That vessel ahead is not privileged - he approached from our port side, therefore is the burdened vessel, and he can no longer maneuver to shift his burden to Forrestal." "Flag Bridge Aye"! I could envision some hot shot flag watch officer digging the Admiral's shoe out of his ass, and smiled inwardly. I didn't hear the Admiral's voice, but I knew he was watching from his favorite perch.
Somewhere about then I had the signal gang close up "Uniform" on both halyards - "U" is the international signal that says "you are standing into danger". Then our navigator got into it. First he told me I was going to have to turn the ship and he was working on our new course. Since he was a commander and I was a lieutenant, I explained as tactfully as I could that we were not going to turn, leastways not to a pre-planned course. We were the privileged vessel, and as such, were REQUIRED to hold course and speed. Next thing I heard from him was "Mr. Corbeille, I'm ordering you to turn this ship." With no attempt at tact, I advised him "Commander, you cannot order me to turn this ship. If you believe the ship to be sufficiently endangered, you, as Navigator, can summarily relieve me as OOD. Then you can turn left, turn right, or come dead in the water. But you cannot order me to turn. Do you want to relieve me?" Rather truculently, he then asked if the Captain knows about all this. I told him yes indeed, and at contact range of 1,000 yards, I was to notify the Captain again. "You better call him again - right now!" "No Sir, we still have a few hundred yards to go."
At this stage, I don't recall the exact time, the bridge relief crew was coming on deck, but no one was ready to be relieved. I spied my relief OOD waiting in the wings and he wanted nothing more than to stay out of the way. Admittedly, I got a bit nervous, and I called the captain back when the trawler was 1,100 yards ahead. His only response was "I'm on my way up".
He arrived momentarily with the PCO of Independence following in his wake. He hopped up in his chair, says "Boy, he is pretty close, isn't he." Then he asked "and when do you plan to make your big move?" I told him that if it closes to 500 yards, we can order up All Back Emergency Full, Right Full Rudder, and we will miss him. He asked: Is that what the book says? I told him "No Sir, The book says 400 yards, but I was leaving in a little cushion. He said "We need only to maneuver in extremis to MINIMIZE DAMAGE". That is a slight departure from international rules, but was our standing order, arrived at specifically to contend with harassment vessels.
This is kind of a delicate point here because International Rules of the Road says the "privileged vessel must maneuver when in extremis to avoid collision". U.S.S.R. (Soviet Union) was not signatory to the International Rules of the Road, therefore her vessels were not bound by them. It must be pointed out that Russian ships, merchantmen and men-of-war alike, followed the international rules of the road anyway, and knew them well enough to "play chicken" with U.S. ships, mostly to our embarrassment. That was a game that our Navy had long since tired of, hence the new guidance to maneuver only in extremis to minimize damage. Naturally, it behooved one to be absolutely certain that he was absolutely right, if he were going to take a Navy man-of-war down to the wire in a potential collision situation. I'm sure there are readers who have more background concerning our maneuvering instructions, but we believed we understood them perfectly. I still believe that we did.
Having thus indicated his intentions, the Captain then asked "So how close can we take her?" I told him 400 yards would provide a grazing situation, and then ordered the engine room to stand by for Emergency Backing Bells. We were still closing and had reached the 500-yard mark when the trawler put in left full rudder. His rudder was not the size of a barn door - It had to have looked like the side of the barn itself! That guy turned 90 degrees left in a heartbeat!
We never flinched, never wavered, and the trawler passed close aboard to port - so close, in fact, that the hull was not visible alongside our flight deck. All that was visible from the vantage point of our bridge were the two masts as they went rapidly down our port beam. Then we launched a helo for some photo work and a big sigh of relief went up from the bridge. The navigator started lobbying for us to file a harassment report, but since we had altered neither course nor speed to accommodate the trawler, it was hard to make a case for harassment. I wanted to make out a harassment report on the navigator but the CO calmed me down on that score.
The Prospective Commanding Officer (PCO) of Independence, bless his soul, took in the whole affair after arriving on the bridge with our Captain, and never interjected one word. When it was all over, he moved directly in front of me and said, loud enough for almost everybody on the bridge to hear, "No one could have done better." Our CO joined right in and said "Frenchy, You handled that perfectly". At that point I realized I wasn't going to be a lieutenant forever, my advice to the Captain had been sound, and I knew our Captain appreciated it. My breathing gradually returned to normal. For his part, Captain Hill, for that, as I recall, was his name, went on to become CO USS Independence. He assumed command while anchored in some Sicilian Bay, and when Independence stood out to sea "under new management", there was a Russian ELINT trawler, just outside territorial waters, making slight way on Independence's intended track.
A friend serving on that fine vessel told me that the new CO's order to CIC was "Combat, give me a collision course on that trawler at 30 knots!" I heard the same refrain from several other people and I believe it to be what happened. For our part, we spent the remainder of our cruise unhampered in any way by any Russian flagged ship. We continued to see an occasional trawler, but when we came into the wind to launch and recover aircraft, they vanished as if by magic. The word seemed to have leaked out that this carrier has an attitude problem - he'll run right over you! And the Chief Engineer was happy because he got his uninterrupted 4-hour sustained speed run at 20 knots.
Life was not the same for me after that. Our captain made me "Command Duty Officer Underway". I was already the General Quarters OOD and Sea and Anchor Detail OOD, so I wasn't sure what this new designation would lead to.
I soon learned that I was to be on the bridge whenever Forrestal was in formation with other major combatants, (destroyers didn't count, but cruisers did), and that I was to provide training to all prospective Command Duty Officers.
Anytime there was underway replenishment, there was a "formation", so I got to spend a lot of valuable time on the bridge, learning all I could absorb.
Our great captain, nameless up to now, was Robert Bemus Baldwin, born in Bismarck, North Dakota.
He was promoted to RADM upon leaving Forrestal, and the last time I spoke with him he was Vice-Admiral Baldwin, COMNAVAIRPAC. I believe he lives in or near San Diego, and remains the most admired man of my 30-plus year Navy career.
CAPT R. CLAUDE CORBEILLE USN (RET)
Castle Rock, WA
Sunday, February 20, 2022
Interesting News 2/13/2022
Democrats in New York are trying to gerrymander the GOP out of the NY contingent in the US House of Representatives. I'm sure this sort of gerrymandering is fine with our leftist friends. It certainly isn't being reported by their allies in the news.
OK. This isn't new. But it is still relevant to the current political conflicts raging throughout the west. University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Reynolds wrote an essay on the current class war. It isn't poor workers vs. rich capitalists. It is working-class vs. ruling class. The ruling class, the people we employ to run the government, expect our unquestioning compliance to their petty dictates. The working class expects their unquestioning compliance with our rules as indicated in the Constitution.
It looks like Enis Kantor Freedom is about to get bounced from the NBA. He was recently part of a trade deal that left him with the Houston Rockets. They fired him. Mr. Freedom has been a powerful voice against authoritarian governments such as the one in his home nation of Turkey as well as the Chinese Communist Party with their pogram against the Uighurs. He appears to have a few good NBA-level playing years in him. It would be a pity if the CCP was able to influence the hiring decisions made by the American NBA. At least one assumes that the N in NBA stands for "National" and that the nation in question is the USA.
Michele Tafoya is leaving her position with NBC Sports. She has been a feature on the football sideline for decades. I was surprised to learn that she is leaving sports broadcasting for political projects. Turns out that she is a libertarian-leaning Conservative; which is how your humble interlocutor describes himself from time to time. We wish her good fortune in the coming years.
Saw this elsewhere. Covers the issue well enough.
The intolerance on the part of those supporting vax and mask mandates is astounding. Wrecking careers. Destroying businesses. All in pursuit of one end - You Will Comply.
A retiring Marine Corps Lieutenant General, Gregory Newbold, has some thoughts to share about Critical Military Theory; a doctrine that has fallen out of favor with our civilian and military leadership.
People have been having a time tearing into Canadian PM Justin Trudeau over his invocation of emergency powers. I found video of a Conservative Party MP pointing out the change in Mr. Trudeau's position about trusting the people to be interesting as there are a couple of people in the background who appear to be some flavor of POC. They stand and applaud enthusiastically when MP Melissa Lantsman is done asking her question of Mr. Trudeau. One may be a Sikh. I'm not sure. Ever the classy leader, Mr. Trudeau immediately "re-frames" the situation as the Conservative Party is standing with those that wave the swastika. One small issue. Apparently MP Lantsman is Jewish. Hard to see her siding with Nazis on anything. Perhaps Mr. Trudeau's rampant insulting of his countrymen and women is a diversion from his government's oppressive policies? That seems to be the bulk of the political playbook from the left these days.