Showing posts with label Dorothy Parker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dorothy Parker. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Review: Chloe's Kingdom: The Koin Vault Heist

Chloe's Kingdom: The Koin Vault Heist (Stellar Heist Book 1)Chloe's Kingdom: The Koin Vault Heist by Gregory Michael
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review. The spelling and grammar were very good. The story and characters were not compelling enough to make me want to continue after the first few chapters.

Thereafter rose the putative ghost of Dorothy Parker.

I'm glad to have supported the author with a purchase of the book as he supported the idea of respectful disagreement and free speech when another author was bounced from the SPSFC earlier this year.

View all my reviews

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Hemmingway, Steinbeck, and O'Neil

Saving this here for future reference.  Periodically, I will not finish a book and will reference Dorothy Parker.  Dorothy was a writer from the early 20th century.  She is mistakenly credited with saying "This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force."  [I think George Kaufman actually said it.  Dorothy repeated it without attribution in a setting where attribution wasn't really called for.]

In Season 5, Episode 14 of the TV show M*A*S*H, Radar O'Reilly says that he was accepted by the Famous Las Vegas Writers School run by Hemingway, Steinbeck, and O'Neil*.

We find out that the school is run by Ethel Hemingway, Jerry Steinbeck, and Eunice O'Neal.

This post is just a reminder of that sort of flowery writing.  Lots of telling.  Not much showing.

Not worth reading.  Worthy of being tossed aside.  With great force.

Something to watch in the meantime.



*An obvious reference to Ernest Hemingway, John Steinbeck, and Eugene O'Neil.  I'd never heard of Eugene O'Neil before.  I had heard of his son-in-law.

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Review: The Innocence of Death

The Innocence of Death (On Behalf of Death #1)The Innocence of Death by E.G. Stone
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review which is a charitable rating. This book was a hard DNF - Dorothy Parker would be proud of how far I heaved this one.

Our protagonist is a marketing guru. Death decides he needs help polishing up his image and gives our "hero" a choice; die right here and now or serve Death in the hereafter. He goes with option 2.

Shortly thereafter, our hero finds himself with some sort of eternal computer connected to various social networks and an administrative assistant. She is some sort of troll/giant/something big.

Usually, the fish spends more time pondering the lack of water before figuring out how things work. In this book, our protagonist slips into his new role with little muss and less fuss. I checked out when his administrative assistant sits on a sofa that cartoonishly bends/tilts to force our hero to slide down into her.

The plot had generally lost me, and that sort of cartoonish action caused me to move onto something else. Skip this and read something good.

If you want to experience a "fish out of water" and "hero dies and lives on in the hereafter" book, then please read "On A Pale Horse" by Piers Anthony. The first 6 books of that series are great.

But stop after book 6. Please.

View all my reviews

Modest edits for grammar/spelling 2/20/2025

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Review: Dirty Water

Dirty WaterDirty Water by Tom Kratman
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a two-star, Dorothy-Parker-DNF review.

I've enjoyed some of this author's other works a great deal.

This one was boring. I made it 10% through the book before moving on to anything better.

Most of the early parts of the book were a generic old guy taking his grandkids on a tour of Boston and lamenting how things have changed. It was heavy on the geography of Boston and light on making the old guy or his grandkids into interesting characters.

The brief interludes with the alien were good but infrequent and brief.

View all my reviews

Monday, December 4, 2023

Review: MARVEL-VERSE: AMERICA CHAVEZ

MARVEL-VERSE: AMERICA CHAVEZMARVEL-VERSE: AMERICA CHAVEZ by Kieron Gillen
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is a 3-star DNF review.

I don't recall why I picked up this book. Someone was mentioning America Chavez as an underutilized character. I thought I'd give it a shot.

I enjoyed the artwork. It was pretty standard Marvel art. I enjoy standard Marvel art.

The story was OK. Not great, but enough that I'd usually keep moving on.

America has two moms. Ok.

Then there are two male characters that seem into each other. Ok.

Then America goes into a house flying a rainbow flag - to have a make-out session with her girlfriend.

A couple of those elements and I'd have continued on. Everyone has to make room for everyone else. But the book was turning into an identitarian screed bent on excluding non-gay characters while hiding behind the tatters of a superhero story.

Moving onto something better as quickly as possible. Dorothy Parker can have her fun.

View all my reviews

Saturday, September 9, 2023

Review: The Darkness That Comes Before

The Darkness That Comes Before (The Prince of Nothing, #1)The Darkness That Comes Before by R. Scott Bakker
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1-star review which is a reasonable estimate of my experience.

I didn't make it 10% through the book before Dorothy Parker's purported ghost launched it across the room. Within that span, we meet three different individuals. None of them are supplied with sufficient detail to establish a connection with the reader.

There are tons of references to other social/cultural elements of this world. There are several different "1000 shrines of..." or "1000 temples of..." references that feel a lot like Robert E. Howard's Conan stories. The difference is that the number of references to cultures existing outside of a Conan story are relatively few and eventually Conan takes center stage.

At 10% of the book, I was still trying to figure out which characters mattered and why. All of the references to mythic events, people, and other civilizational elements detracted from my engagement with the story.

View all my reviews

Friday, August 18, 2023

Review: Beware the Dog

Beware the Dog (Junkyard Dogs #1)Beware the Dog by Dominique Mondesir
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1.5-star review. I'm being charitable.

Our mild-mannered protagonist is tasked with delivering a memory stock. He boards a rocket ship. It gets raided by pirates. But they are the "nice" kind of pirates. He swallows the stick. Instead of gutting him, they take him along.

He later attempts to escape his captors while drinking with them at a dive bar. He ends up on the floor of a very poorly maintained restroom. His captors get into a gunfight. None of them die. They escape the bar and pile into a car.

In the post-adrenaline-high, our hero and one of his captors (the one girl in the crew who is also easy on the eyes) end up snuggling up together in the back of the car. While he is still soaked in the residuals from the floor of that very poorly maintained restroom.

Many miles and many chapters later, he finds her in his bed. Because...of course he does.

Wish fulfillment fantasy. Many spelling/grammar issues. Written to be made into a movie rather than read as a serious book. Several instances where characters repeat information that the reader already knows. Then there is a bag of clothes that mysteriously appears after our protagonist has been through various assaults, rapid escapes, and other events where picking up a bag is neither convenient to the plot nor actually mentioned in the text.

I made it 29% through the book before theoretically hurling it across the room in a manner purportedly reminiscent of Dorothy Parker.

View all my reviews

Monday, July 17, 2023

Review: This is How You Lose the Time War

This is How You Lose the Time WarThis is How You Lose the Time War by Amal El-Mohtar
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review which is an accurate representation of my experience with this work. I made it 60% through before giving it the purported Dorothy Parker treatment.

Heave, ho! - across the room.

There is nothing to spoil in this book. It is a romance novel wrapped in "science fictinite". "Science fictinite" is a bit like pyrite in that it looks like "science fictium" but is really closer to outright fantasy.

This novella won a Hugo award. Based on the context of other Hugo award-winning works, this one does not belong in that category.

It tells an intertwining story of two characters that putatively "work" for opposing sides. Each side has agents roaming up and down the threads of time weaving strands that work towards their favor.

And that is all you get about the mechanics and impact of time travel. Have a nice day.

The rest of the book is a series of letters. They begin with each side more or less taunting the other. The tone of the letters eventually mutates into affection and ultimately romance of a sort.

The letters imply extensive preparation. One is left in a weaving pattern created years earlier and handed down as craft to the person that unknowingly created the object read by the recipient. Another is a message hidden in some sort of lava (or other superheated material).

If you are looking for an unusual romance to read, then give this a try. If you are looking for some good science fiction, then pass this on by.

Much better time travel works include The Fires of Paratime by L.E. Modesitt Jr. (which ultimately became "The Time Lords") and Replay by Ken Grimwood. If you want some actual time travel, then please read those much better works.

View all my reviews

Friday, February 17, 2023

Review: Swords and Deviltry

Swords and Deviltry (Lankhmar, 1)Swords and Deviltry by Fritz Leiber
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review which is a good estimate of my experience with this book.

The book is really a collection of short stories.

Honestly, several stories into the book and I really didn't care about the main characters. It was far too easy to move on to something better.

View all my reviews

Thursday, February 16, 2023

Review: Shadow & Claw

Shadow & Claw (The Book of the New Sun, #1-2)Shadow & Claw by Gene Wolfe
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review that is a good estimate of my experience.

I managed to get roughly 1/3 through this book before giving up. Fortunately, I found this review that does an outstanding job of breaking down the significant flaws in this book. They have saved me a ton of time.

I've been told by many people that this is a classic of the fantasy genre and an excellent example of the grimdark subgenre.

It isn't.

View all my reviews

Sunday, May 15, 2022

Review: Bystander 27

Bystander 27Bystander 27 by Rik Hoskin
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This book is populated by cliches and cardboard characters. The protagonist is some sort of high-speed special forces guy with an apartment in New York City. There aren't any SF bases in NYC. It goes downhill from there.

The ghost of Dorothy Parker rose in a manner adroit and definitive.

View all my reviews

Monday, December 20, 2021

Review: 11,000 Years

11,000 Years11,000 Years by Mark Roth-Whitworth
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star review. It would have been a 1-star review but for the dearth of spelling and grammar errors.

This book was sold to me by the author under the premise that it contained all of the elements that made golden-age speculative fiction great. It does not include those elements.

Instead, the book leaves the reader with the feeling that a fan gets when going to see their favorite author/singer/actor live and gets stuck looking at a cardboard cutout displaying the author/singer/actor's likeness.

The early sections of the book are indeed populated by cardboard characters. They are flying on the Spaceship Cardboard. Their leader is Captain Cardboard. One of the crew is Frenchie Cardboard (no relation to the captain). Frenchie is French. She is the only character that speaks in an accent to let you know that she is French. Just in case you missed it, she wears a beret later in the book.

The Captain is a stoic and heroic figure who everyone admires even after he purposefully avoids dealing with events that will drive his ship close to a black hole in a maneuver that throws his ship a titular 11,000 years in the future. All he had to do was point the ship in a different direction a couple of days early and the rest of the story need not happen.

There are religious people on the ship. A few. The only overtly Christian character ends up sodomizing his gay roommate to death and then killing himself.

Ah, the nuance. That's probably the only word this author cannot spell.

We learn that even though the ship is in the middle of a crisis, the crew has a union that must be consulted before the captain can do anything. All great explorations involved union labor or something.

After the ship is heading off to discover what has happened to humanity in the intervening millennia, we switch to one of the main human multi-system civilizations. Essentially, all of humanity's major religions have been homogenized and combined to create a massive theocracy that oppresses everyone in service to no particular diety whatsoever.

At this point, the book cribs notes from the vastly superior work of Robert A. Heinlein. In particular, the book picks up some plot points from Revolt in 2100; where a young man of faith seeks to save a young woman of faith and then ends up finding out that their religion is a sham. Except, in this case, they keep believing in the religion and work to make it better.

The author seems to think that the sole purpose of religion is to engage in hypocrisy.

We return to the SS Cardboard which manages to fight off an attack from the pseudo-religious civilization. They run for the shelter provided by a second civilization.

With those two civilizations in conflict, a diplomatic meeting is arranged. The crew from the SS Cardboard is brought in to help observe and moderate.

A crew that is missing 11,000 years worth of knowledge, understanding, and context about the development of current human civilizations is deemed to be appropriate moderators for a diplomatic meeting.

Dorothy Parker's ghost had been impatiently tapping her foot for some time. This book was heaved across the room with great relish.

Run away from this book and go find something good to read. Like a grocery store coupon circular.

View all my reviews


-----

The author came in contact with me regarding this review.  And after a bit of retrospection, I think that an update is in order.

The 2-star rating is going to stay.  That is how good this book is.

But, I do think it is worthwhile to boil down my criticisms.

1.  Cardboard characters.

The author spent a lot of time making sure that the characters are diverse.  He described their color, gender, and nation of origin in great detail.  But he didn't do anything to differentiate their characters.  Except for the French lady.  She had an accent.  And a beret.

2.  The captain is well respected even though his leadership directly results in the ship traveling perilously close to the event horizon and tossing it 11,000 years in the future.  The crew still looks up to him after that massive screwup.

3.  This is an exploratory ship and not a cruise ship.  It travels into hazardous regions where quick decisions have to be made.  Yet the captain must get permission from the union before setting a course.  Never in the course of human history has such a thing happened.  

Private sector unions are great organizations under most circumstances.  A ship on an expedition to a remote location isn't one of those circumstances.  Save the virtue signaling for another time.

4.  The middle section of the book was actually pretty interesting.  The two main characters were going places, doing things, and revealing the fictional world in an entertaining way.  Unfortunately, the entire arrangement seemed heavily cribbed from Heinlein's "Revolt in 2100".

At least in "Revolt in 2100", the characters realized that their theocratic state was bad/evil/destructive and then left it.  In this book, our heroes identify the problem and...stay the course.  It just doesn't make any sense.

5.  The theocracy is presented as an amalgamation of all of humanity's religions.  The author seems not to understand that beyond the belief in a "higher power", religions simply are not the same.  You cannot unplug Buddhism and insert Hoahaoism despite the latter being an offshoot of the former.  Small differences become very important to believers.  Belief in one conception of "God" is not the same as all other belief systems.  Just ask the Lutherans and the Roman Catholics.

6.  Later on, the crew that was tossed forward in time by 11,000 years gets asked to serve as arbitrators for a diplomatic meeting.  People who have missed out on 11,000 years of human history and evolution are then expected to navigate and negotiate the differences between two conflicting empires.  That would be worse than asking Gilgamesh to facilitate negotiations between North Korea and Japan in 2023.

Quite frankly, the author does not appear to know how people relate to one another.  He knows how he imagines that people relate to one another.  But he's got no clue about how the real world works.  And it shows.

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Review: Storm Between the Stars: Book 1 in the Fall of the Censor

Storm Between the Stars: Book 1 in the Fall of the CensorStorm Between the Stars: Book 1 in the Fall of the Censor by Karl K. Gallagher
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star DNF review. The only reason it gets 2-stars is because the English spelling/grammar editing is quite good.

Made it 15% into the book and found that I really didn't care about any of the characters. They were cardboard cut-outs that were moving around on the author's whim.

And the digital equivalent of the Dorothy Parker treatment ensued.

View all my reviews

Friday, April 23, 2021

Book Review - The Stone Knife


The Stone Knife (The Songs of the Drowned, #1)The Stone Knife by Anna Stephens
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

Cardboard characters. The introductory chapters felt more like an identity politics indoctrination class rather than a work of fiction where individual identities are an integral part of the narrative.

Dorothy Parker is holding on line 1.

View all my reviews

Friday, April 9, 2021

Review: The East Witch

The East WitchThe East Witch by Cedar Sanderson
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

Only was able to manage a few chapters with such a cardboard main character. I was interested in experiencing this author's work. They may have other works that are great. This one...not so much.  Dorothy Parker came-a-callin'!

View all my reviews

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Review: Hammer and Tongs and a Rusty Nail

Hammer and Tongs and a Rusty NailHammer and Tongs and a Rusty Nail by Ian Tregillis
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1-star review. That accurately reflects my experience.

As this is really just a short story, the review will be equally short.

Tor published this short story that is part of George R.R. Martin's "Wild Cards" universe. I made it 20% of the way through before stopping. At that point, I really didn't care about the characters and really didn't have a great idea of their abilities or limitations. I've enjoyed all of the other Wild Cards stories I've ever read.

I might have continued on and given this a 2 or a 3-star rating. But the publisher and their copyeditor didn't show up for this project. It seemed like there was a spelling issue on every other page. Mostly just missing spaces that were needed to split up two words that had mistakenly conjoined.

The author didn't care enough to run spell-check. The editor didn't care enough to do the same thing. Avoid this story and move onto the next.

View all my reviews

Saturday, September 5, 2020

Review: The Dawnhounds

The Dawnhounds The Dawnhounds by Sascha Stronach
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star DNF review. That accurately represents my experience with this book.

I barely made it through the first few chapters. The opening chapter was an interesting hook. A crew was returning from exploring distant lands. Something they had brought back with them had infected some of the crew turning them into something....else. The hatches were locked and the uninfected crew was trying to make it home before thirst and starvation took them as well.

And then that crew died.

We moved on to a character that was a somewhat disgraced member of the police. She had been relegated to the night shift "for her own good". We learn little else of interest about this world after that. She has a sexual encounter and runs after a pickpocket.

The story just quickly devolved into something that was decorated with "fantasium" so that it seemed like a fantasy story but was really something more mundane.

The ghost of Dorothy Parker feasted on the rest of the book.

View all my reviews

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Review: Rocks Fall. Everyone Dies.

Rocks Fall. Everyone Dies. Rocks Fall. Everyone Dies. by Eddie Skelson
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1-star review. That is more stars than it is worth.

The author is in dire need of a copyeditor and needs to retake 8th grade English/grammar.

I read less than a dozen pages before I was consumed with the urge to hurl this book across the room, Dorothy Parker style. Sadly, it was an electronic copy.

View all my reviews

Friday, August 2, 2019

Review: Heroing

Heroing Heroing by Dafydd ab Hugh
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

This is a 1-star, Dorothy Parker review. That is an accurate assessment of my experience.

Five chapters. That's all it took. And as it was a physical book, the opportunity to evaluate its aerodynamic capabilities was not to be denied. The gouge in the drywall will need to be fixed.

It appears that this is the first book written by the author. It showed.

In five chapters, there was no character development. Why was she there? Why did she want to go adventuring/fighting? What personality quirks endeared her to the reader.....or made her interestingly repellant.

Nothing.

Within the story of the book, the heroine was broke and out of work. Within the text, it is demonstrated that she isn't very good at "heroing". At least, she doesn't demonstrate any special capacity for it.

There is a bit of misogyny expressed by other characters that seems to suggest that what she lacks is an opportunity rather than lacking in the ability.

It was about that time that I found the author's statement at the back of the book. Apparently, this book was an attempt to illustrate the "patriarchy". The book accomplishes that task poorly by using a character that is ill-prepared for any opportunity that might come her way.

The primary sins of this book are that it fails to present interesting characters and places an unsubtle polemic objective before the task of telling a good story. I read several other books both immediately before and immediately after that subtly and effectively did a better job of discussing issues surrounding equality than this awful load of offal.

Heroing might have reached the rare achievement of being a book that will go in the dustbin instead of to a used book store or a Little Free Library.

View all my reviews

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Review: Space Opera

Space Opera Space Opera by Catherynne M. Valente
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

This is a 2-star, DNF, Dorothy Parker review. That is a thoroughly accurate representation of my experience.

Minor spoilers ahead. Nothing that will ruin the plot as this one flew across the room in the fifth chapter.

Read as a part of evaluating the finalists for the 2019 Hugo award for "Best Novel". Selected as my first novel this year at random.

John Scalzi blurbed the book as:

"As if Ziggy Stardust went on a blind date with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, then they got smashed and sang karaoke all night long. Cat Valente is mad and brilliant and no one else would have even thought of this, much less pulled it off."

Surprisingly, I've not bothered to read The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. But I've read lots of other humorous and/or off-beat works. They can be fun.

And I enjoy listening to David Bowie along with a lot of other musical oddities. So again, this sounds like it could be fun.

I was already more motivated to write about this book rather than reading it by chapter 3. The first two chapters were filled with the message that humanity is not the sole sentient species in the universe. The other species think their expression of sentience is the gold standard of sentient life. Everyone else is "meat".

And some gratuitous slagging of Enrico Fermi.

Lots of extended exposition that does a lot of "telling" and not very much "showing".

The story does not improve when we begin to meet our erstwhile protagonists in chapter 3. They are rock stars of mediocre wattage that over-imbibe in various mind-altering substances and glam rock style makeup. The lead singer seems inspired by the pastiche of David Bowie and Freddie Mercury. But those two were wholly likable. Little work is done to create a connection between the reader and the protagonists.

Chapter 4 is filled with the "wacky" efforts of one of the afore-mentioned sentient aliens (an Esca) to communicate with every inhabitant of planet earth....at the same time.

Essentially, the major sentient life-forms have decided that humanity is sufficiently advanced to be invited to a galactic sing-off where humanity isn't expected to win and will be thoroughly obliterated if they don't manage to be sufficiently entertaining. You see, these major sentient species had an ugly war in the past. And they decided a dance/sing-off was a better method for resolving difference? Put a pin in that for a minute.

The book blurbs suggested that this book was funny. And there were a few amusing moments. Nothing nearly as amusing as the works of Robert and Lynn Aspirin or Piers Anthony.

In chapter 4 there is a passage where the Esca is using familiar mental images (parents, a friendly waitress) to break the news to all of humanity that their collective lives are on the line.

Perhaps because, no matter their luck in life, they knew in their bones that at least they were better than the kid who brought them their steak medium, not medium-rare, and so could cling to the idea that humans were still the ones being served with a smile, the ones who were always right, the ones with a place at the table, not a place at the dishwasher, for a few precious minutes longer.


Hogwash. Most people appreciate waitstaff because we have had that sort of crappy job. We sympathize with the person that has a crap job and still does their best at it...just like we did.

Later on the Esca is defending the intergalactic sing-off with:

We have a responsibility to those who were here already when that chap with fangs and fur turned up pretending to be civilized.


Is the author actively supporting immigration restrictions, colonialism, and mass slaughter of aboriginal peoples?

By the time I made it to chapter 5, I'd had enough. The text heaps derision on the idea of the individual; at one point the Esca indicates that they had a "problem with libertarians", but they eventually pulled it out.

The entire history of the science fiction and fantasy genre is filled with authors illustrating the efforts of individuals to struggle against and hopefully break the efforts of the collective to make the collective's definitions of "acceptable" to be the only acceptable standard for every individual's behavior. If there is a sub-text to the sf/f genre, it is one of extolling the individual above the desires of the collective.

This novel didn't go into the Dorothy Parker bin because of all those nitpicks. The nitpicking was an indication of a book that contained serious flaws. Extensive exposition, protagonists with few features to base a connection, the humor was barely there, and other general editing flaws (i.e. we are told that the Esca refer to themselves as a "choir" only to have a later self-reference be to "the Esca". The editor was either absent or ignored in this book.

Back to that "pin".  The book does have the nut of a good idea worth exploring.  How do we treat less advanced civilizations?  Should we intrude on peoples that do not have a desire for our level of technology and force them to demonstrate an ability to be "civilized" according to our tastes?  It is [Is it] legitimate to shield ourselves from civilizations that might pose a lethal threat?  Interesting ideas coupled with a less than stellar execution.






View all my reviews