The point of her reporting was that the Syrians were pummeling the city and killing indiscriminately. She said something the the effect that there were no military targets there. Specifically, she said there was no "base" there. The stateside reporter reminded her that the Syrian Free Army was in the area. The reporter in Syria blithely dismissed that and went on protesting that they were killing innocent civilians. After all, the SFA didn't have a "base".
Why was she surprised? This is a war.
The wars of the 20th century were truly civilized when compared with the rest of human history. It was common practice to kill and enslave until all your enemies were dead or enslaved. The line from the original Conan the Barbarian movie was the rule.
To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.There was no letting up. There was no avoiding civilians.
This is the sort of war that non-Western, non-democratic cultures routinely practiced. The stark difference between the two is what should make the practice of war by Western, democratic cultures all the more unique.
Do they not teach history in journalism school any more?
No comments:
Post a Comment