I think I could come to like these guys.
The biggest difference between these guys and the nutjob in Florida that did the same thing? The nutjob lives in a free country where free speech is prized more highly than religious sensitivities. As a result, the likelihood that he will ever pay anything more than a modest "price" for his "offense is quite low.
Conversely, the two guys in the video face a variety of pretty horrific deaths if their identities ever become know. They are courageous heroes in every sense.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Saturday, April 9, 2011
The Saving Grace Of Technology
It is always "too soon to tell" whenever the cutting edge of science and engineering momentarily intrudes on our world. However, with petroleum headed upwards from $100 a barrel and petro-dollars fueling terrorism around the globe, the development of a new, high-efficiency engine couldn't be more timely.
Michigan State University Professor Norbert Mueller has been working on the design of a new method for converting gasoline into energy. His engine is called the "Wave Disc Generator".
As I understand his explanation, the WDG spins to compress gasoline mixed with air. The mixture is ignited at high pressures which in turn unleashes the energy stored in the gasoline. What makes this approach remarkable is that it couples an inexpensive to build motor with very high efficiency. Current piston styled engines use 15 percent of the fuel they consume for propulsion. The rest of the fuel's energy is spent as heat. The WDG uses 60 percent of the fuel for propulsion. The result is an engine that is 3.5 times as efficient.
As an added benefit, the WDG design also reduces pollutants by as much as 90 percent.
The WDG design is perfect for our currently evolving hybrid vehicles. The WDG engine operates most efficiently at one particular speed. Connecting the engine to a generator would provide a highly efficient means of recharging batteries in a hybrid vehicle.
With hybrids reaching 40 mpg, converting those existing designs to use the Wave Disc Generator should result in fuel efficiencies in the 120 to 140 mpg range.
Norbert Mueller and his Wave Disc Generator engine:
Michigan State University Professor Norbert Mueller has been working on the design of a new method for converting gasoline into energy. His engine is called the "Wave Disc Generator".
As I understand his explanation, the WDG spins to compress gasoline mixed with air. The mixture is ignited at high pressures which in turn unleashes the energy stored in the gasoline. What makes this approach remarkable is that it couples an inexpensive to build motor with very high efficiency. Current piston styled engines use 15 percent of the fuel they consume for propulsion. The rest of the fuel's energy is spent as heat. The WDG uses 60 percent of the fuel for propulsion. The result is an engine that is 3.5 times as efficient.
As an added benefit, the WDG design also reduces pollutants by as much as 90 percent.
The WDG design is perfect for our currently evolving hybrid vehicles. The WDG engine operates most efficiently at one particular speed. Connecting the engine to a generator would provide a highly efficient means of recharging batteries in a hybrid vehicle.
With hybrids reaching 40 mpg, converting those existing designs to use the Wave Disc Generator should result in fuel efficiencies in the 120 to 140 mpg range.
Norbert Mueller and his Wave Disc Generator engine:
The Death Penalty From A Lawyer's Perspective
David Dow is a law professor. He is also a lawyer that devotes most of his non-teaching time to defending death row inmates. Terry Gross' interview of Mr. Dow was recently replayed on NPR. The page on NPR's site includes a brief passage from his book "The Autobiography Of An Execution".
The audio should be up in the evening of April 8, 2011. I have no idea when this post will be published at this point.
At one point, Ms. Gross demonstrates why I dislike her show. Rather than asking Mr. Dow what sort of people he imagined meeting on death row and how did reality square with his preconceptions, she fills in the blanks so that the only thing he has left to say is "yes". I was really more interested in hearing his thoughts rather than having her spoon feed him during the interview.
An anachronism reared its' ugly head while reading the excerpt from his book. He writes:
Yet during the interview, he revealed how judges become sloppy in their execution of the law when it comes to the prosecution of irredeemable defendants. He perceives that those judges decide that issues regarding the administration of our laws (i.e. evidentiary rules, due process, etc.) simply matter less when someone who is clearly a person of malintent stands before them in court.
Considering that a life hangs in the balance, shouldn't our courts ensure that every lawyer is dotting all the i's and crossing all the t's? Not just the lawyers for the defendant? For the one act of punishment that cannot be undone, shouldn't our courts be particularly cautious instead of being more cavalier?
Not unlike other issues, I am conflicted when it comes to the death penalty. There are some murders where we know that the accused is truly guilty. In many of those cases, it seems to me that taking the life of the murderer is a just and appropriate punishment.
At the same time, it seems to me that we have too low a standard for prosecutorial conduct when it comes to pursuing the death penalty. And apparently we have too low of a standard for judicial conduct in such cases as well. Perhaps their lives should hang in the balance as well.
I do not want to preclude the imposition of justice on the truly worthy. The death of Timothy McVeigh comes quickly to mind when thinking of the truly worthy. At the same time, I do not want to see the innocent die, nor do I want to see mitigating circumstances, evidentiary rules, and rules of judicial conduct ignored in a head long rush towards the unjust imposition of capital punishment.
The interview with Mr. Dow is indeed enlightening and interesting. I hope you will enjoy listening to it.
The audio should be up in the evening of April 8, 2011. I have no idea when this post will be published at this point.
At one point, Ms. Gross demonstrates why I dislike her show. Rather than asking Mr. Dow what sort of people he imagined meeting on death row and how did reality square with his preconceptions, she fills in the blanks so that the only thing he has left to say is "yes". I was really more interested in hearing his thoughts rather than having her spoon feed him during the interview.
An anachronism reared its' ugly head while reading the excerpt from his book. He writes:
Maybe, I said, we had called something by the wrong name. You might think that when a life is at stake, formal legal rules would not matter so much, but you would be wrong. People die when their lawyers neglect to dot the i's or cross the t's. I decided we would refile what we had already filed, and just call it something different. Because I couldn't think of any other explanation, I convinced myself the problem was with the title. Necessity's eldest child is invention; her second-born is rationalization. Gary's the fastest typist. I asked him to get started working on it.
Yet during the interview, he revealed how judges become sloppy in their execution of the law when it comes to the prosecution of irredeemable defendants. He perceives that those judges decide that issues regarding the administration of our laws (i.e. evidentiary rules, due process, etc.) simply matter less when someone who is clearly a person of malintent stands before them in court.
Considering that a life hangs in the balance, shouldn't our courts ensure that every lawyer is dotting all the i's and crossing all the t's? Not just the lawyers for the defendant? For the one act of punishment that cannot be undone, shouldn't our courts be particularly cautious instead of being more cavalier?
Not unlike other issues, I am conflicted when it comes to the death penalty. There are some murders where we know that the accused is truly guilty. In many of those cases, it seems to me that taking the life of the murderer is a just and appropriate punishment.
At the same time, it seems to me that we have too low a standard for prosecutorial conduct when it comes to pursuing the death penalty. And apparently we have too low of a standard for judicial conduct in such cases as well. Perhaps their lives should hang in the balance as well.
I do not want to preclude the imposition of justice on the truly worthy. The death of Timothy McVeigh comes quickly to mind when thinking of the truly worthy. At the same time, I do not want to see the innocent die, nor do I want to see mitigating circumstances, evidentiary rules, and rules of judicial conduct ignored in a head long rush towards the unjust imposition of capital punishment.
The interview with Mr. Dow is indeed enlightening and interesting. I hope you will enjoy listening to it.
Global Temperature Data
Ran across this item:
March 2011 ended up as the coolest March globally since March of 1994. The actual global temperature anomaly for the lower troposphere last month was negative 0.026 C.
This is also the first month since June of 2008 that the global temperature anomaly was in the negative.Which seems important in that last year we started kayaking in early March and this year we haven't yet gotten our boats wet.
Friday, April 8, 2011
Gabriel Iglesias - A Racist???!!??
I hate laughing that hard when I know I'm not supposed to laughing at all.
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Education By Sound Reasoning.....Or Politics?
I bet you thought that President Obama's education policies were going to be based on fact, science, efficacy, a similar high minded ideals. Ummmm......nope.
Fiscal Analogy
Most analogies fail at some point. But sometimes they are quite useful.
As a country, we have a problem with debt and with deficits. We are in a fiscal hole. Call it a 100 yard deep hole.
Wisconsin's Paul Ryan has presented a plan that is the fiscal equivalent of 80 yards of sturdy rope.
Harry Reid and the Democrats are offering the fiscal equivalent of 30 yards of light twine. You couldn't start building a sturdy rope with it.
John Boehnerare is negotiating for 60 yards of light twine.
You are at the bottom of that 100 yard deep hole. Which option do you want coming to the rescue?
As a country, we have a problem with debt and with deficits. We are in a fiscal hole. Call it a 100 yard deep hole.
Wisconsin's Paul Ryan has presented a plan that is the fiscal equivalent of 80 yards of sturdy rope.
Harry Reid and the Democrats are offering the fiscal equivalent of 30 yards of light twine. You couldn't start building a sturdy rope with it.
John Boehner
You are at the bottom of that 100 yard deep hole. Which option do you want coming to the rescue?
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Death And Taxes.....Well Just Taxes This Time
My highly esteemed and well read visitors will no doubt have heard the big news in corporate taxation. General Electric paid $0 in taxes last year! In fact, they got billions of dollars back!!
!!!!!
At least, so says the ever questionable New York Times.
Megan McArdle has a piece about how the Times reporters screwed things up. Fortunately this isn't a case of the reporters maliciously misrepresenting the facts. Instead, it is a case where reporters assigned to report on matters of corporate and tax accounting should have known that those are two very different types of accounting that almost always result in two very different answers.
Ms. McArdle also makes the persuasive case....again....for total elimination of corporate income taxes.
Let's face facts. Corporations do not pay a single penny in corporate income taxes. People do. Investors pay by getting lower returns. Employees and managers pay by getting less in salary and/or benefits. Customers pay by paying higher prices.
Given that the corporate income tax only generates a few hundred billion dollars ($191 billion in 2010) in revenue, is it really the most effective method for collecting taxes? No.
Particularly when so many businesses, including GE, spend so much money on accountants to keep track of the taxes owed, and spend so much time and money getting Congress to tweek the tax code to their advantage. Ever hear of tax credits for wind power? Care to guess what business (among many) GE is in?
Ms. McArdle's stuff is always a great read.
!!!!!
At least, so says the ever questionable New York Times.
Megan McArdle has a piece about how the Times reporters screwed things up. Fortunately this isn't a case of the reporters maliciously misrepresenting the facts. Instead, it is a case where reporters assigned to report on matters of corporate and tax accounting should have known that those are two very different types of accounting that almost always result in two very different answers.
Ms. McArdle also makes the persuasive case....again....for total elimination of corporate income taxes.
Let's face facts. Corporations do not pay a single penny in corporate income taxes. People do. Investors pay by getting lower returns. Employees and managers pay by getting less in salary and/or benefits. Customers pay by paying higher prices.
Given that the corporate income tax only generates a few hundred billion dollars ($191 billion in 2010) in revenue, is it really the most effective method for collecting taxes? No.
Particularly when so many businesses, including GE, spend so much money on accountants to keep track of the taxes owed, and spend so much time and money getting Congress to tweek the tax code to their advantage. Ever hear of tax credits for wind power? Care to guess what business (among many) GE is in?
Ms. McArdle's stuff is always a great read.
The Purpose Of A Dog
A friend sent this along via email. We're having some issues here at the ranch and they are puppy related.
Asha is 11+ years young. Which is a pretty good run for a dog of his size. We hope to have him around for a few years more because he is always just a joy to be with.
But we are also having to deal with how much we want him to have to deal with in terms of discomfort. And then there's money. Vets can almost make dogs live forever....as long as your pockets reach down to your socks.
But that little six year old had Asha just right. He has known how to live from the moment he finally got those oversized paws steadily underneath him.
And he lives that way every day.
Being a veterinarian, I had been called to examine a ten-year-old Irish Wolfhound named Belker. The dog's owners, Ron, his wife Lisa , and their little boy Shane, were all very attached to Belker, and they were hoping for a miracle.
I examined Belker and found he was dying of cancer. I told the family we couldn't do anything for Belker, and offered to perform the euthanasia procedure for the old dog in their home.
As we made arrangements, Ron and Lisa told me they thought it would be good for six-year-old Shane to observe the procedure. They felt as though Shane
Might learn something from the experience.
The next day, I felt the familiar catch in my throat as Belker's family surrounded him. Shane seemed so calm, petting the old dog for the last time, that I wondered if he understood what was going on. Within a few minutes, Belker slipped peacefully away.
The little boy seemed to accept Belker's transition without any difficulty or confusion. We sat together for a while after Belker's death, wondering aloud about the sad fact that animal lives are shorter than human lives.
Shane, who had been listening quietly, piped up, ''I know why.''
Startled, we all turned to him. What came out of his mouth next stunned me. I'd never heard a more comforting explanation. It has changed the way I try and live.
He said, ''People are born so that they can learn how to live a good life -- like loving everybody all the time and being nice, right?''
The Six-year-old continued, Well, dogs already know how to do that, so they don't have to stay as long.''
Live simply.
Love generously.
Care deeply.
Speak kindly.
Remember, if a dog was the teacher you would learn things like:
- When loved ones come home, always run to greet them.
- Never pass up the opportunity to go for a joyride.
- Allow the experience of fresh air and the wind in your face to be pure ecstasy.
- Take naps.
- Stretch before rising.
- Run, romp, and play daily.
- Thrive on attention and let people touch you.
- Avoid biting when a simple growl will do.
- On warm days, stop to lie on your back on the grass.
- On hot days, drink lots of water and lie under a shady tree.
- When you're happy, dance around and wag your entire body.
- Delight in the simple joy of a long walk.
- Be loyal.
- Never pretend to be something you're not.
- If what you want lies buried, dig until you find it.
- When someone is having a bad day, be silent, sit close by, and nuzzle them gently.
Asha is 11+ years young. Which is a pretty good run for a dog of his size. We hope to have him around for a few years more because he is always just a joy to be with.
But we are also having to deal with how much we want him to have to deal with in terms of discomfort. And then there's money. Vets can almost make dogs live forever....as long as your pockets reach down to your socks.
But that little six year old had Asha just right. He has known how to live from the moment he finally got those oversized paws steadily underneath him.
And he lives that way every day.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Neal Stephenson Quotes
Courtesy of Instapundit comes this little historical gem:
There are folks that claim that anti-intellectualism is all the rage in America. I think it sort of depends of what one is calling "intellectual" as there are some ideas that can be dressed up in as many pretty university degrees as you like and they still won't be more than the rhetorical equivalent of pig in poop.
Curiousity about Mr. Stephenson led to this quote:
"The difference between stupid and intelligent people -- and this is true whether or not they are well-educated -- is that intelligent people can handle subtlety. They are not baffled by ambigous or even contradictory situations -- in fact, they expect them and are apt to become suspicious when things seem overly straightforward."
Examples are left to the student as an exercise.....
The twentieth century was one in which limits on state power were removed in order to let the intellectuals run with the ball, and they screwed everything up and turned the century into an abattoir. . . . We Americans are the only ones who didn’t get creamed at some point during all of this. We are free and prosperous because we have inherited political and value systems fabricated by a particular set of eighteenth-century intellectuals who happened to get it right. But we have lost touch with those intellectuals.
There are folks that claim that anti-intellectualism is all the rage in America. I think it sort of depends of what one is calling "intellectual" as there are some ideas that can be dressed up in as many pretty university degrees as you like and they still won't be more than the rhetorical equivalent of pig in poop.
Curiousity about Mr. Stephenson led to this quote:
"The difference between stupid and intelligent people -- and this is true whether or not they are well-educated -- is that intelligent people can handle subtlety. They are not baffled by ambigous or even contradictory situations -- in fact, they expect them and are apt to become suspicious when things seem overly straightforward."
Examples are left to the student as an exercise.....
Friday, March 25, 2011
Nuclear Perspective
Perspective - Nuclear Power
I linked on my Facebook page a few days ago to this graphic from XKCD that compared various levels of radioactivity. Now I'm linking to this graphic that shows the relative number of deaths per kilowatt hour from nuclear, oil, and coal based power respectively.
While we remain focused on the ongoing Japanese tragedy in the wake of the recent tsunami, I think it is worthwhile to maintain a bit of perspective. While the NYTimes has done some outstanding reporting on this event, they have also done some miserable reporting. One example was a story I read last week that referred to the "containment building" in a manner that would lead those without any knowledge about nuclear power to believe that the steel and concrete "containment vessel" had exploded. Another example has been the casual use of terms like "meltdown" and "radioactivity" without providing any perspective on either topic. A couple of their online features have provided an outstanding exploration of both nuclear power plant construction and the relative harm or non-harm of various radiation levels.
Similar reports abound, so I'm not just criticizing the NYTimes. Of course, the dearth of information coming out of Japan has not helped.
A brief disclaimer - I love nuclear power. I prepared a speech on nuclear power for a persuasive public speaking competition in high school. Not only did I do a fair amount of reading, my research included interviews with nuclear engineers responsible for nuclear power plants here in Michigan. This was a few years after the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island. To this day I will almost automatically buy any science magazine that includes information on nuclear power plant innovations.
As a matter of perspective, it should be remembered that Three Mile Island did experience a partial core meltdown. As a result, part of the fissionable materials ended up melting and pooling at the bottom of the steel and concrete containment vessel. That liquid core material ended up melting 5/8 of an inch through the 3 inch thick steel bottom of the vessel. There have been no measurable increases in deaths due to the Three Mile Island partial meltdown.
As a matter of perspective, the information available thus far suggests that the primary risk group in Japan are those that have been working to regain control of the facility. Their efforts to cool the used rods as well as the active reactors are nothing short of heroic and some of them may very well pay with their lives.
But beyond the power plant, radioactive exposure levels have been mostly minimal. We can survive quite easily at low levels of continuous radiation as well as periodic exposure to modest levels of radiation. Were it otherwise, we would not know the benefits of X-rays for broken bones, CT scans, and other modern medical marvels. Nor would we know coast to coast air travel or living at high altitudes such as Denver, CO.
It also appears thus far than most of the radioactivity beyond the immediate area of the power plant is the result of materials that have reasonably short half-lives. Those materials will be nothing but a bad memory after a month or two.
Of course, things could still get worse. They could lose total control of the plant, the spent rods could overheat and spit and sputter radioactive materials hundreds of feet into the air. They may have already. We shouldn't confuse that condition with anything approaching normal. Nor should we confuse it with the broad swath of contamination resulting from the openly burning Chernobyl disaster of a few years ago....or with the fission reactions that leveled Hiroshima.
As the graphic at the second link is meant to imply, things could be far worse. Instead of nuclear power, the Japanese could have built an equivalent capacity in coal fired power plants. The result would have been more people dead as a result of mining coal as well as from the byproducts of burning coal.
A proper sense of perspective would remind us that there is a significant difference between "none", "some but still safe", "risky", "not safe", "really not safe", "leveling a major city", and "the end of the world". In my opinion, far too much reporting is of the breathless variety that implies that we are rapidly approaching "the end of the world" when the reality is far less dire. By focusing to much on the significant challenges posed by the nuclear power plant, we end up ignoring the much larger tragedy caused by the tsunami. As of today, the count of dead and missing people is rapidly approaching 30,000. I am certain that the number of people killed by the power plant problems will be easily dwarfed by those killed by the ocean rising out of its rightful place to crash and destroy the people of Japan.
The people of Japan will continue to face a great many challenges in the weeks and months to come. Those challenges will be compounded by potential risks associated with the meltdown at the nuclear power facility. The spread of radioactive pollutants will remain a serious concern for the people of Japan and around the world.
But as a matter of perspective, we should recall that there are greater challenges in the world than those being posed by one nuclear power plant that was shaken by the earth and pummeled by an ocean. And that has still managed to avoid broad scale contamination.
Thus far.
I linked on my Facebook page a few days ago to this graphic from XKCD that compared various levels of radioactivity. Now I'm linking to this graphic that shows the relative number of deaths per kilowatt hour from nuclear, oil, and coal based power respectively.
While we remain focused on the ongoing Japanese tragedy in the wake of the recent tsunami, I think it is worthwhile to maintain a bit of perspective. While the NYTimes has done some outstanding reporting on this event, they have also done some miserable reporting. One example was a story I read last week that referred to the "containment building" in a manner that would lead those without any knowledge about nuclear power to believe that the steel and concrete "containment vessel" had exploded. Another example has been the casual use of terms like "meltdown" and "radioactivity" without providing any perspective on either topic. A couple of their online features have provided an outstanding exploration of both nuclear power plant construction and the relative harm or non-harm of various radiation levels.
Similar reports abound, so I'm not just criticizing the NYTimes. Of course, the dearth of information coming out of Japan has not helped.
A brief disclaimer - I love nuclear power. I prepared a speech on nuclear power for a persuasive public speaking competition in high school. Not only did I do a fair amount of reading, my research included interviews with nuclear engineers responsible for nuclear power plants here in Michigan. This was a few years after the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island. To this day I will almost automatically buy any science magazine that includes information on nuclear power plant innovations.
As a matter of perspective, it should be remembered that Three Mile Island did experience a partial core meltdown. As a result, part of the fissionable materials ended up melting and pooling at the bottom of the steel and concrete containment vessel. That liquid core material ended up melting 5/8 of an inch through the 3 inch thick steel bottom of the vessel. There have been no measurable increases in deaths due to the Three Mile Island partial meltdown.
As a matter of perspective, the information available thus far suggests that the primary risk group in Japan are those that have been working to regain control of the facility. Their efforts to cool the used rods as well as the active reactors are nothing short of heroic and some of them may very well pay with their lives.
But beyond the power plant, radioactive exposure levels have been mostly minimal. We can survive quite easily at low levels of continuous radiation as well as periodic exposure to modest levels of radiation. Were it otherwise, we would not know the benefits of X-rays for broken bones, CT scans, and other modern medical marvels. Nor would we know coast to coast air travel or living at high altitudes such as Denver, CO.
It also appears thus far than most of the radioactivity beyond the immediate area of the power plant is the result of materials that have reasonably short half-lives. Those materials will be nothing but a bad memory after a month or two.
Of course, things could still get worse. They could lose total control of the plant, the spent rods could overheat and spit and sputter radioactive materials hundreds of feet into the air. They may have already. We shouldn't confuse that condition with anything approaching normal. Nor should we confuse it with the broad swath of contamination resulting from the openly burning Chernobyl disaster of a few years ago....or with the fission reactions that leveled Hiroshima.
As the graphic at the second link is meant to imply, things could be far worse. Instead of nuclear power, the Japanese could have built an equivalent capacity in coal fired power plants. The result would have been more people dead as a result of mining coal as well as from the byproducts of burning coal.
A proper sense of perspective would remind us that there is a significant difference between "none", "some but still safe", "risky", "not safe", "really not safe", "leveling a major city", and "the end of the world". In my opinion, far too much reporting is of the breathless variety that implies that we are rapidly approaching "the end of the world" when the reality is far less dire. By focusing to much on the significant challenges posed by the nuclear power plant, we end up ignoring the much larger tragedy caused by the tsunami. As of today, the count of dead and missing people is rapidly approaching 30,000. I am certain that the number of people killed by the power plant problems will be easily dwarfed by those killed by the ocean rising out of its rightful place to crash and destroy the people of Japan.
The people of Japan will continue to face a great many challenges in the weeks and months to come. Those challenges will be compounded by potential risks associated with the meltdown at the nuclear power facility. The spread of radioactive pollutants will remain a serious concern for the people of Japan and around the world.
But as a matter of perspective, we should recall that there are greater challenges in the world than those being posed by one nuclear power plant that was shaken by the earth and pummeled by an ocean. And that has still managed to avoid broad scale contamination.
Thus far.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Let Him Keep It - He's Finally Earned It
I've been hearing a rising chorus of voices urging....demanding....that Mr. Obama return his Nobel Peace Prize.
I think he should keep it. He has finally earned it.
There was no peace for the Libyans that were being oppressed by Gaddafi's dictatorial regime. When they sought to use their individual human right to protest their oppression, a right supposedly guaranteed by the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that regime took what little 'peace' those Libyans had when it took their lives.
By ordering the American armed forces to enter into that conflict, Mr. Obama has moved to secure peace for the defenseless and an opportunity for a better life for any Libyan that did not enjoy Col. Gaddafi's favor. No person should ever be forced to seek succor via acts of obeisance and obedience to their government.
Yet that was the reality in Libya last week. Who knows what next week will hold.
But this week Mr. Obama has led this nation to take a stand against oppression.
As we did at Normandy.
As we did at Osan.
As we did at Hue and in the Mekong.
As we did in El Salvador
As we did in Beirut.
As we did on Grenada.
As we did in Panama.
As we did in Kuwait.
As we did in Somalia
And...yes...as we did on the streets of Baghdad and Kabul.
While our tactics have been on rare occasions unworthy, our purpose remains clear.
Freedom for all that desire that opportunity.
Let Mr. Obama keep his Nobel. And perhaps the Nobel committee could work on awarding one to Mr. Bush for his efforts to extend true peace to those who had none.
I think he should keep it. He has finally earned it.
There was no peace for the Libyans that were being oppressed by Gaddafi's dictatorial regime. When they sought to use their individual human right to protest their oppression, a right supposedly guaranteed by the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that regime took what little 'peace' those Libyans had when it took their lives.
By ordering the American armed forces to enter into that conflict, Mr. Obama has moved to secure peace for the defenseless and an opportunity for a better life for any Libyan that did not enjoy Col. Gaddafi's favor. No person should ever be forced to seek succor via acts of obeisance and obedience to their government.
Yet that was the reality in Libya last week. Who knows what next week will hold.
But this week Mr. Obama has led this nation to take a stand against oppression.
As we did at Normandy.
As we did at Osan.
As we did at Hue and in the Mekong.
As we did in El Salvador
As we did in Beirut.
As we did on Grenada.
As we did in Panama.
As we did in Kuwait.
As we did in Somalia
And...yes...as we did on the streets of Baghdad and Kabul.
While our tactics have been on rare occasions unworthy, our purpose remains clear.
Freedom for all that desire that opportunity.
Let Mr. Obama keep his Nobel. And perhaps the Nobel committee could work on awarding one to Mr. Bush for his efforts to extend true peace to those who had none.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Snipers....Men Of Life
Not death. At least if you are in need of their protection.
On one occasion they killed eight Taliban in two hours, ‘I wasn’t comfortable with it at first,’ said Osmond, ‘you start wondering is it really necessary?’ But the reaction of the locals soon persuaded him. ‘We had people coming up to us afterwards, not scared to talk to us. They felt they were being protected’.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Why We Loathe BIG Government
One of the most frustrating issues in my political life is the apparent lack of appreciation amongst my many leftish friends for the basis of my point of view. I'm not looking for agreement. Just an appreciation for why I believe the things I believe.
And "because yer nuts" doesn't count.
And "because yer nuts" doesn't count.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Krugman - Erroneous - But I Repeat Myself
In a recent column, Paul Krugman, the NYTimes' Nobel Laureate columnist, attempts to make the point that less government is a bad thing. To illustrate his point, he suggests that Texas is in deep trouble as indicated by high school drop out rates and child poverty rates.
Mr. Krugman apparently lacks the nuance needed to evaluate exactly by Texas has a problem with childhood poverty as he neglects to discuss any factors beyond government spending...such as a porous border and a flood of illegal aliens...that might contribute to childhood poverty.
However, it is true that childhood poverty is a problem in Texas.
Trouble arises when one takes a closer look at the high school drop out data. Bryan Preston of the PJ Tattler links to a couple of credible data sources to make the point that at least on the subject of high school drop outs, Texas isn't exactly in the worst of conditions. Mr. Preston is careful to point out that the data is from adjacent years, so the comparison isn't perfect.
However, Mr. Krugman's argument is significantly undermined when you look at actual drop out rates and state spending per pupil.
Mr. Krugman apparently lacks the nuance needed to evaluate exactly by Texas has a problem with childhood poverty as he neglects to discuss any factors beyond government spending...such as a porous border and a flood of illegal aliens...that might contribute to childhood poverty.
However, it is true that childhood poverty is a problem in Texas.
Trouble arises when one takes a closer look at the high school drop out data. Bryan Preston of the PJ Tattler links to a couple of credible data sources to make the point that at least on the subject of high school drop outs, Texas isn't exactly in the worst of conditions. Mr. Preston is careful to point out that the data is from adjacent years, so the comparison isn't perfect.
However, Mr. Krugman's argument is significantly undermined when you look at actual drop out rates and state spending per pupil.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Beer Pong - Championship Techniques
Courtesy of the Manswers show on the Spike network.
Ladies are involved.....
Some might even detect a hint of misogyny....
A NSFW warning is certainly appropriate....
Don't say I didn't warn you before you click here.
Ladies are involved.....
Some might even detect a hint of misogyny....
A NSFW warning is certainly appropriate....
Don't say I didn't warn you before you click here.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Begging For Equal Time
The Tea Party is allegedly a racist organization funded by billionaires.
What does that make these folks?
Someone wake me when that story hits the front pages of the NYTimes and Washington Post. 'Cause then I'll know that the world is about to be raptured!
What does that make these folks?
Someone wake me when that story hits the front pages of the NYTimes and Washington Post. 'Cause then I'll know that the world is about to be raptured!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
